Back to @ManUtdBorn's profile

Shuga engagement report

@ManUtdBorn - 297K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.005%
of 297K followers
Per impression
0.71%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.758% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 341x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #pfa, #ucl. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #pfa, #ucl.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Shuga sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 30, 2023341x their median

    i speak for everyone when i say David De Gea deserves a proper send off. he’s a club legend https://t.co/W6TjPRX0Ba

    5.0K4065214189K viewsView on X
  • May 1, 202519x their median

    since Amorim got hired - Harry Maguire has been one of best players !! https://t.co/xtTxeLUlHX

    2731024013K viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 202512x their median

    Dorgu is another Malacia - can’t pass, can’t shoot, can’t cross, can’t score https://t.co/F9m3ZE5OmO

    141636312K viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 20259.8x their median

    Bruno Fernandes is an absolute genius - been carrying Manchester United for years !! https://t.co/JgwnmR27gr

    1399807.5K viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 20254.3x their median

    subbing off Mazraoui for Shaw was a bad decision ! https://t.co/Mz5OB5eQHi

    621519.5K viewsView on X
  • Mar 16, 20253.8x their median

    Eriksen actually played against us in the first half !! https://t.co/AYXvX8PYM3

    525218.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.0x their median

    a very bad day for Bruno Fernandes and Kobbie Mainoo haters !! https://t.co/0mhuYgpwnT

    424202.6K viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 20252.8x their median

    maturing is realizing that Garnacho is mid and not fit for purpose !! https://t.co/uKe0cWkvhC

    403205.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20252.6x their median

    Benjamin Sesko in this game would have scored - what was Amorim thinking ?? https://t.co/42SIappWJg

    353305.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 10, 20252.6x their median

    unbelievable that it took Onana just 25mins to prove Matic right !! https://t.co/owwc37v9Wx

    322611.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#pfa#ucl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.758% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 341x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #pfa, #ucl. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Shuga's engagement rate on X?
Shuga (@ManUtdBorn) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 297,338 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Shuga sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ManUtdBorn have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ManUtdBorn post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going