Back to @MalcolmNance's profile

Malcolm Nance engagement report

@MalcolmNance - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.19%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
1.16%
170K views on a typical post
Reach
16.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
98 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
9/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 170K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80K interactions, about 40x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ae574d, #chefsfornepal, #iranwar‌.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #ae574d, #chefsfornepal, #iranwar‌.

Compared with accounts its own size

Malcolm Nance's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.19%, Malcolm Nance sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.438%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202640x their median

    Trump supporter: “I’m totally against vaccines. Absolutely, 100%. Every single one of them. They’re poison” Jason Selvig: “What about Polio vaccine?” TS: “There hasn’t been a case of Polio in how many years, since 1960?” JS: “Since the vaccine…” TS: “Yeah” https://t.co/V6aR5FIrP7

    69K8.7K1.2K9123.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202621x their median

    Islam didn't come to America on the Mayflower. Islam is here because of we brought it here. Importing people whose values are incompatible with our way of life and governing system fundamentally makes our nation weaker. https://t.co/ySBJf0ZMWU

    32K7.6K2.1K305549K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202615x their median

    To quote a friend, “Caffeine and hate are my fuels” Stay tuned for DataRepublican v2 https://t.co/yIhKyOGIL8

    25K4.1K1.5K209641K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.1x their median

    “No matter how insurmountable the odds may seem, good will prevail. Ukrainians prove this every single day. I’m honored to stand with you. Glory to Ukraine! And may the Force be with you all!” UNITED24 ambassador @MarkHamill sends his warmest regards to Ukraine and our people❤️ https://t.co/desGnfKGlb

    9.8K2.1K1365389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.6x their median

    View the complete details on this recall at: https://t.co/omyGCMUfCP. https://t.co/lkQBFMBR0d

    4.2K1.3K1831.4K5.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.2x their median

    Putin takes the new Volga car out for a ride Gives it his personal signature as a bonus https://t.co/7ea4cgFmSY

    5.3K64319359505K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    SCOOP: Trump officials are pressuring the National Park Service to find a way to give a small piece of Yosemite to a private developer. The land would be used for a road, to give the developer rare private access to the heart of the park. https://t.co/3mPZ9NJ5aK

    3.0K1.8K268383743K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.7x their median

    10 reps of 45 lbs. My morning workout preparing to fight crime in DC 🤣🤣🤣🇺🇸 https://t.co/hB1fiwfypC

    4.6K19460543149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    Just go fucking vote. https://t.co/WFzMeNuMkV

    3.7K99837061127K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20262.6x their median

    The Iran Deal: Trump has officialy lost the US-Iran War. Trump authorized up to $400 Billion to end a war he started. He signed the instrument of surrender at Versailles palace just like the Germans did in 1919 ... at Versailles palace. At Hegseth's insistence, America wasted thousands of stealth missiles and advanced air defense weapons only to make the IRGC stronger and give them uncontested control of the Strait of Hormuz and by extension the entire Persian Gulf region. Obama didn't do any of that.

    3.2K1.5K23362136K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ae574d#chefsfornepal#iranwar‌#sorrynotsorry

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 170K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80K interactions, about 40x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ae574d, #chefsfornepal, #iranwar‌.

What is Malcolm Nance's engagement rate on X?
Malcolm Nance (@MalcolmNance) has an engagement rate of 0.19%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,035,640 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.19%, Malcolm Nance sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MalcolmNance have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MalcolmNance post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going