Back to @MagnusRanstorp's profile

Magnus Ranstorp engagement report

@MagnusRanstorp - 116K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.685%
of 116K followers
Per impression
2.99%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
22.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
792
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 792 interactions against 116K followers, an engagement rate of 0.685%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #october7.

Compared with accounts its own size

Magnus Ranstorp's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.685%, Magnus Ranstorp sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link70% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 383 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20244.5x their median

    Jag är otroligt glad att äntligen kunna dela denna nyhet med er alla – min nya bok är här! ✨ Strax innan den 7 oktober 2023 var jag på plats i Israel för att delta i en konferens om säkerhetsläget i regionen. Mossad-chefen och chefen för Israeliska försvarsmakten deltar också. Fokus är helt på Hizbollah och Iran, Hamas nämns inte alls. Veckor senare inträffar katastrofen, och Hamas har chockat Israel och hela världen med sitt brutala våld. I min nya bok Hamas: terror inifrån ger jag en djupgående och personlig analys av rörelsens historia. Jag träffar organisationens högsta ledare och kastar nytt ljus på Hamas drivkrafter: från rötterna i Gaza till den våldsamma framväxten som en av de mest inflytelserika och kontroversiella aktörerna i Mellanöstern. Boken släpps den 1 oktober men du kan förbeställa den signerad här: https://t.co/exYwx1xHoy

    2.9K40123614312K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.0x their median

    Boeing 737 Max-planet från Flydubai dök i 39 graders vinkel under kapningsförsöket, rapporterar Wall Street Journal. Som jämförelse sker en normal nedstigning inför landning med omkring tre graders vinkel. Under dykningen nådde planet Mach 0,96 – mycket nära ljudhastigheten. På den aktuella höjden motsvarade det omkring 1 020 kilometer i timmen. En Boeing 737 Max flyger normalt i omkring Mach 0,82. På bara 92 sekunder förlorade planet omkring 5 300 meters höjd. Flygplanskroppen skakade våldsamt och utsattes för extrema aerodynamiska krafter. Delar av sidorodret slets loss från stjärtpartiet. När en av piloterna som tagit över kontrollen lyckades häva dykningen utsattes flygplanet för krafter på omkring 3 G. Det är högre än den belastning på 2,5 G som flygplansmodellen normalt är konstruerad för att klara under flygning. Trots den extrema dykningen, den mycket höga hastigheten och skadorna på flygplanet lyckades piloterna återta kontrollen och landa planet säkert.

    2.1K21786658K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20263.0x their median

    Om utlänningar vill få danskt medborgarskap ska deras värderingar överensstämma med de danska. Därför vill 🇩🇰 regeringen införa en modell som granskar personer som ansöker om danskt medborgarskap för odemokratiska åsikter. https://t.co/i07ibZCO92

    2.0K271623039K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.4x their median

    Andrepiloten knivhögg kaptenen – sedan störtade passagerarplanet mot marken. Israeliska myndigheter misstänker att det kan ha handlat om ett försök att medvetet krascha planet – en attack som för tankarna till den 11 september. Ombord på Flydubais flygning från Dubai till Tel Aviv på onsdagen fanns över 170 personer, de flesta israeler. Med omkring en timme kvar till destinationen utbröt kaos i cockpit. Andrepiloten attackerade kaptenen med kniv och planet föll närmare 4 300 meter på mindre än 30 sekunder. Striden i cockpit var våldsam. Delar av planets roder skadades svårt och passagerarna trodde att de skulle dö. Kaptenen lyckades öppna cockpitdörren. Passagerare och besättningspersonal stormade in och övermannade andrepiloten. Han bands fast med hjälp av hörlurar medan andra försökte återfå kontrollen över planet. Därefter kunde andra piloter ombord från Storbritannien ta över och planet nödlandade i Tabuk i Saudiarabien. Andrepiloten greps av saudiska myndigheter. Enligt israeliska medier är han medborgare i Oman.

    1.7K186611059K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.2x their median

    Kommer inte att kasta in handduken, det blir SVT ikväll igen.

    1.4K4725728277K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.9x their median

    ALLA bör se detta om FlyDubai👇 Vilka hjälteinsatser! https://t.co/PwjjFLdrlC

    1.3K19639929K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    ”Ett blodigt lakan skulle bevisa att min vän var en hedervärd kvinna. Efter decennier av debatt är förtrycket fortfarande brutal verklighet för många flickor” skriver @rektor_linnea Det Linnéa lyfter är avgörande. Hedersförtryck är ett brutalt angrepp på människors frihet – rätten till sin egen kropp, sin kärlek och sitt eget liv. Ingen kultur, tradition eller föreställning om heder står över individens mänskliga fri- och rättigheter. Aldrig. Frihet måste gälla alla. Annars är den inte värd namnet. https://t.co/FryFZ63uSY

    8499719412K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    Den misstänkte Flydubai-kaparen Hamam al-Hamami tänkte krascha flygplanet på Ben Gurion-flygplatsen i Israel, som var planets destination. Det uppger han i förhör enligt israeliska medier. https://t.co/i6BaghMREw

    8309222220K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    Över 850 elever saknas i skolorna – vet inte var de är https://t.co/WM8H6JtoVb

    714113781425K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Vilka fullständiga idioter som lagt vildsvin utanför en moské. En avskyvärd provokation! Sådant här hör inte hemma i Sverige! ”Dött vildsvin utanför Sandvikens moské – medlemmarna uppgivna” https://t.co/s98hvY0u4G

    64337199853K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#october7

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 792 interactions against 116K followers, an engagement rate of 0.685%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

What is Magnus Ranstorp's engagement rate on X?
Magnus Ranstorp (@MagnusRanstorp) has an engagement rate of 0.685%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 115,768 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.685%, Magnus Ranstorp sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MagnusRanstorp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MagnusRanstorp post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going