Back to @MadridCFyB's profile

¡Hala Madrid! engagement report

@MadridCFyB - 218K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 218K followers
Per impression
0.984%
5.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
55
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 55 interactions against 218K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.984% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 1079x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #levantebarça.

Compared with accounts its own size

¡Hala Madrid!'s engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, ¡Hala Madrid! sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 124 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 28, 20221079x their median

    Abuelo, también estás aquí https://t.co/0JrArQwHK9

    56K2.8K141271View on X
  • Jul 31, 2026171x their median

    Yo mandaba 3000 turistes madrileños pa Marruecos. Que se jodan.

    7.9K1.2K19972225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026150x their median

    Es surrealista que haya gente que celebre que el Atlético intente bloquear la salida de Julián al Barça. No se dan cuenta que su jugador les ha dicho privada y PÚBLICAMENTE que se quiere ir. QUE SE QUIERE ir al Barça. Y que si se quedara sería OBLIGADO. Un poco de orgullo...

    5.2K2652.6K193603K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202626x their median

    - ROJA A YURI - AMARILLA A XAVI ESPART. NO ES FÚTBOL, ES LA LIGA NEGREIRA. https://t.co/WuRQfY6jbx

    1.2K19429753K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202623x their median

    🏟️ LA NFL SE RINDE ANTE EL BERNABÉU Peter O’Reilly, vicepresidente ejecutivo de la NFL: “El Santiago Bernabéu es LO MÁS. El primer año de Madrid como ciudad anfitriona fue un ÉXITO ENORME y esta vez volverá a serlo”. El 8 de noviembre, Bengals y Falcons disputarán el segundo partido oficial de la NFL en el templo blanco. El Bernabéu ya no es solo un estadio: es un ESCENARIO MUNDIAL.

    1.1K137161174K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202616x their median

    Pq esto no es expulsión? @LaLiga , CTA CORRUPTOS https://t.co/4nJRrKZZPF

    71715612958K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202615x their median

    Pues no, os jodeis @diarioas https://t.co/3Tid90ooyK

    726963810K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    😇 Efectivamente, el empujón previo que recibe Vinicius, le hace desequilibrar y de ahí el presunto piscinazo 🎞️ ¡Cuidado con los vídeos recortados! 🫸 Sin ver el empujón previo, parece piscinazo 🙌 Gracias @Ramon_AlvarezMM ⚽️ #RealMadridRealSociedad https://t.co/utjSvtRrcQ

    21430143250453K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202610x their median

    LA CORRUPCION DE BARCELONA NO SOLO DEBE DINERO AL CITY A 19 EQUIPOS MAS https://t.co/ckPdSsrfYL

    42310232228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20269.1x their median

    ⚽️ #LevanteBarça ⌚️ Min. 46 💥 Penalti para el @FCBarcelona 🧐 Mandi, que primero toca el balón con la mano, siendo esta no punible, al llevarla de camino al apoyo, luego golpea a Lamine Yamal en su intento de despeje ✅ Es penalti 🎥 @MPlusDeportes https://t.co/QsqKK9gHlI

    53937761116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#levantebarça

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 55 interactions against 218K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.6K times each, and 0.984% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 1079x its own typical post.

What is ¡Hala Madrid!'s engagement rate on X?
¡Hala Madrid! (@MadridCFyB) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 218,214 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, ¡Hala Madrid! sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MadridCFyB have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MadridCFyB post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going