Back to @MadelonVos__'s profile

Madelon Vos engagement report

@MadelonVos__ - 85K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.864%
of 85K followers
Per impression
2.17%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
39.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
732
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 732 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0.864%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 39.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Madelon Vos's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.864%, Madelon Vos sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video48% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 369 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20268.5x their median

    BREAKING: COINBASE JUST ANNOUNCED THEY HAVE NOW OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED #BITCOIN BACKED MORTGAGES 120 MILLION AMERICANS CAN NOW BUY A HOME USING BTC AS COLLATERAL THIS IS ABSOLUTELY HISTORIC 🔥 https://t.co/2zW5pZEZj6

    5.1K81816675261K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.3x their median

    Ik zie vrij heftige uitspraken voorbij komen in de legacy Media en hier op X over de Box 3 plannen. Bij Nieuws van de Dag duidt Erik de Zwart zojuist: “de minister wil 2,5 miljoen mensen éxtra voor hun bek slaan, ze worden namelijk extra belast door deze plannen van de overheid.” “In een sok stoppen is misschien zelfs het meest verstandige” “Het zal de run op Spaanse huizen vergroten, mensen zullen denken: Ik pak mijn biezen want ik wordt aan alle kanten beroofd.” Ben jij het eens met Erik?

    2.0K2052311590K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.5x their median

    Elke keer denk ik: gekker kunnen ze het niet maken. En elke keer blijkt mijn verbeelding beperkter dan hun belastingplannen. Mijn hemel. Ik krijg me toch een partij zin om te gaan rebelleren. Waar ligt voor jou de grens?

    1.4K145257935K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.2x their median

    “Ik pak mijn biezen, want ik word aan alle kanten beroofd.” zullen steeds meer mensen volgens Erik de Zwart denken. En dat is niet zo gek ook nu vermogens vanaf om en nabij de €10.000,- al in aanraking zullen komen voor 36% Box 3 belasting op alles boven de €1000 aan rendement.

    1.2K1831714117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.8x their median

    Box 3 plannen uitgelekt: Het belastingvrije rendement zal dalen van €1800 naar €1000. Hierdoor gaan juist honderdduizenden méér spaarders en beleggers box 3 betalen. Iedereen die meer dan €1000 rendement behaalt, betaalt straks 36% belasting over het deel boven die grens. Het Overton Window in full effect. Van vermogensaanwas-, naar een hele scherpe vermogenswinst belasting.

    80924127324124K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.8x their median

    De overheid is zo'n onbetrouwbare partner in deze... Nieuwe verkiezingen uitroepen lijkt mij verstandiger dan doorgaan op deze voet. Ingrijpende Box 3 beslissingen als deze verdienen een helder democratisch mandaat. Wat een blamage!

    1.1K15381216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.7x their median

    We doen het volgende voor een krachtige economie, ondernemers en harde werkers:
 ☑️ Geen belasting op papieren winst in box 3, alleen op werkelijke winst ☑️ €450 miljoen extra voor de koopkracht van werkenden. Werkenden betalen minder snel het hoogste tarief ☑️ Ondernemen wordt meer lonend (lager tarief Box 2) ☑️ De overheid investeert meer in infrastructuur (€5 miljard extra) en bezuinigt structureel €3.5 miljard op zichzelf ☑️ Uitkeringen worden hervormd, zodat meer mensen werken en het sociaal vangnet behouden blijft voor wie het echt nodig heeft ☑️ De belasting op erfenissen en het eigen huis blijft onveranderd

    93211.0K50170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Wel bizar hoor: vermogensaanwasbelasting werd aangedragen als de énige mogelijkheid, omdat vermogenswinstbelasting voor de systemen van de fiscus veel te ingewikkeld was. Nu blijkt: vermogenswinstbelasting kan ineens toch wel vanaf 2028 (en raakt iedereen met +/-10k aan beleggingen), maaaaar niet voor bitcoin en cryptobezitters met vermogen op een Ledger. Zij worden ieder jaar gestraft in de vorm van vermogensaanwas belasting. Bewaar je het bij een bank dan geldt vermogenswinstbelasting. Wat een gelulhannes! Kan iemand mij vertellen waarom @Minister_FIN dit in vredesnaam geaccordeerd heeft?!

    7981211276105K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Door vanaf 2028 vermogensaanwasbelasting toe te passen op bitcoin en crypto zal menig belegger voor die tijd verkopen. Zij stappen in een bitcoin/crypto ETF, ETN, ETP, want vermogenswinstbelasting. In 2030 vallen bitcoin en crypto ook onder vermogenswinstbelasting. Beleggers gaan hun ETF, ETN, ETP, echter niet verkopen om weer in te ruilen voor 'echter bitcoin/crypto', want dan komt vermogenswinstbelasting om de hoek kijken. Belasting is de gedragsprikkel. Controle is het doel.

    69710693531K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Het begrotingsplan van het kabinet gaat nu al op de helling. De coalitie is geschrokken van de eigen plannen van gisteren en de boze reacties van spaarders 👇 @nieuwsuur https://t.co/xvXfFly7Cr

    52510419532135K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 732 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0.864%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 39.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

What is Madelon Vos's engagement rate on X?
Madelon Vos (@MadelonVos__) has an engagement rate of 0.864%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,173 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.864%, Madelon Vos sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MadelonVos__ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MadelonVos__ post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going