Back to @MadeForMums's profile

madeformums engagement report

@MadeForMums - 50K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 50K followers
Per impression
0%
111 views on a typical post
Reach
0.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 50K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 111 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.222% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2 interactions.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

madeformums's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, madeformums sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 2026

    National Magazine Day: 5 reasons children should read magazines, according to experts https://t.co/W7j4sHPaYF

    2000163 viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2024

    https://t.co/E3VSl8p1VT

    20001.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 2026

    Why your 40s could be the best decade for sex, according to experts https://t.co/xZVFBVBfOb

    1000223 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Can masturbation help ease menopause symptoms? A new study and wellness product suggest it can https://t.co/wRBcvwtz8g

    000058 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Grey divorce is becoming more common - but why are more couples are divorcing after 20 years of marriage? https://t.co/Q7PV5HGNAT

    000084 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Up to 20 NHS maternity units could close - What does this mean for mums-to-be? https://t.co/qLbv4EuFSX

    000069 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Where kids can eat free (or for £1) this October half term 2026 https://t.co/Or255bYIkF

    000035 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Where kids can eat free (or for £1) this October half term 2026 https://t.co/NN5ySPp18P

    000043 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Why are French schoolchildren protesting? The teenage movement that's sparked nationwide unrest https://t.co/LmWw4Bd0gu

    000085 viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Can you still have a baby after 40? Fertility expert reveals what the celebrity ‘geriatric pregnancy’ boom isn't telling you https://t.co/GGSvNx2OWh

    000093 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 50K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 111 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.222% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2 interactions.

What is madeformums's engagement rate on X?
madeformums (@MadeForMums) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 50,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, madeformums sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MadeForMums have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MadeForMums post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going