Madalyn Sklar engagement report
@MadalynSklar - 113K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 113K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 786 times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.698% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 770x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Madalyn Sklar's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Madalyn Sklar sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.673% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 11% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 36% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 6, 2026770x their median
Nano Banana 2.1 is here! This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in: - visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking imagery Try it now in @GeminiApp, @GoogleAIStudio, and more. https://t.co/2BuwyVfKmS
- Sep 21, 202626x their median
Your meeting context, now in Claude and ChatGPT. Connect Notetaker to pick up where your meeting left off and keep work moving forward. https://t.co/HRrwzRxPLZ
- Oct 2, 20266.5x their median
You can reinvent yourself at any age. There is no expiration date on starting something new.
- Sep 30, 20265.3x their median
You don’t have to have the whole path figured out. You just need to know your next move.
- Oct 5, 20263.7x their median
“Obstacles don’t have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don’t turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it.” -Michael Jordan
- Jun 20, 20263.0x their median
After 30 years in digital marketing, social media, and online community building, I’m officially opening up a limited number of 1:1 strategy sessions. If you want help with AI, digital strategy, content, or growing your brand, here’s how to work with me. https://t.co/MbTSh63EpF
- Sep 22, 20262.2x their median
I don’t measure whether an AI tool is worth using by how many times I open it. I measure what it gives me back. Did it save me an hour? Help me get unstuck? Turn an idea into something usable? That’s the ROI I care about.
- Oct 4, 20262.0x their median
A good reminder that the “biggest” AI model isn't automatically the one you should use. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5, and Anthropic says it can cost up to 30% less per task. The better question isn't “Which AI is #1?” It's “Which AI works best for THIS job?”
- Sep 30, 20262.0x their median
Heads up... there will be no AI shortcuts livestream tomorrow. But keep an eye on my feed for the latest happenings I uncover in the AI world.
- Sep 26, 20262.0x their median
One of my favorite ways to use ChatGPT is as a thinking partner. I don't just ask: “Is this a good idea?” I'll ask: “What am I missing?” “What's the weak point?” “What assumption am I making?” “Argue the other side.” AI becomes much more useful when you stop treating it like an answer machine.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 113K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 786 times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.698% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 770x its own typical post.
- What is Madalyn Sklar's engagement rate on X?
- Madalyn Sklar (@MadalynSklar) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 112,558 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Madalyn Sklar sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MadalynSklar have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MadalynSklar post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.