Back to @MadalynSklar's profile

Madalyn Sklar engagement report

@MadalynSklar - 113K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 113K followers
Per impression
0.763%
786 views on a typical post
Reach
0.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 113K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 786 times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.698% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 770x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Madalyn Sklar's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Madalyn Sklar sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,467 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video11% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link36% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 2026770x their median

    Nano Banana 2.1 is here! This upgraded version outperforms our previous models across the board, with notable leaps in: - visual design - mask-based editing - subject consistency - more natural-looking imagery Try it now in @GeminiApp, @GoogleAIStudio, and more. https://t.co/2BuwyVfKmS

    4.0K364149113207K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202626x their median

    Your meeting context, now in Claude and ChatGPT. Connect Notetaker to pick up where your meeting left off and keep work moving forward. https://t.co/HRrwzRxPLZ

    13768315K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20266.5x their median

    You can reinvent yourself at any age. There is no expiration date on starting something new.

    295411.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20265.3x their median

    You don’t have to have the whole path figured out. You just need to know your next move.

    262401.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20263.7x their median

    “Obstacles don’t have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don’t turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it.” -Michael Jordan

    164201.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20263.0x their median

    After 30 years in digital marketing, social media, and online community building, I’m officially opening up a limited number of 1:1 strategy sessions. If you want help with AI, digital strategy, content, or growing your brand, here’s how to work with me. https://t.co/MbTSh63EpF

    140402.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.2x their median

    I don’t measure whether an AI tool is worth using by how many times I open it. I measure what it gives me back. Did it save me an hour? Help me get unstuck? Turn an idea into something usable? That’s the ROI I care about.

    80411.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20262.0x their median

    A good reminder that the “biggest” AI model isn't automatically the one you should use. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5, and Anthropic says it can cost up to 30% less per task. The better question isn't “Which AI is #1?” It's “Which AI works best for THIS job?”

    9120898 viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.0x their median

    Heads up... there will be no AI shortcuts livestream tomorrow. But keep an eye on my feed for the latest happenings I uncover in the AI world.

    110101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.0x their median

    One of my favorite ways to use ChatGPT is as a thinking partner. I don't just ask: “Is this a good idea?” I'll ask: “What am I missing?” “What's the weak point?” “What assumption am I making?” “Argue the other side.” AI becomes much more useful when you stop treating it like an answer machine.

    70501.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 113K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 786 times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.698% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 770x its own typical post.

What is Madalyn Sklar's engagement rate on X?
Madalyn Sklar (@MadalynSklar) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 112,558 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Madalyn Sklar sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MadalynSklar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MadalynSklar post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going