Back to @MWLOrg_en's profile

Muslim World League engagement report

@MWLOrg_en - 3.2M followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 3.2M followers
Per impression
0.273%
100K views on a typical post
Reach
3.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
274
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 274 interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 100K times each, and 0.273% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Muslim World League's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Muslim World League sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 470 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 20263.8x their median

    Statement from the Muslim World League: https://t.co/MH4RsRwbmZ

    719220869416K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.1x their median

    The Muslim World League continues to promote awareness of the Charter of Makkah, particularly in countries with Muslim minority communities. This is carried out through a range of initiatives and programs, including integrating the Charter's principles into religious curricula and awareness campaigns. It is worth noting that the Charter was endorsed by more than 1,200 muftis and scholars, along with more than 4,500 Muslim intellectuals, who gathered in Makkah—the unifying Qibla—representing a diverse range of Islamic schools of thought and sects. The member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) have adopted the Charter for implementation in their religious, educational, and cultural institutions.

    51142263489K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20261.9x their median

    “A United Voice” From across the Islamic world, the voices of prominent Islamic figures, including muftis and senior scholars, unite in strongly condemning the Houthi terrorist militia’s attacks against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, affirming their full solidarity with the Kingdom and their support for all measures it takes to deter the aggressors and safeguard its security and the safety of its citizens and residents. Watch highlights from the remarks of H.E. Sheikh Dr. Mohammed Al-Issa @MhmdAlissa, Secretary-General of the Muslim World League and Chairman of the Organization of Muslim Scholars, and other prominent Islamic figures.

    4861822187K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20261.9x their median

    The Muslim World League extends sincere condolences: https://t.co/pxn2cmvqBB

    50511100151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.8x their median

    In confronting the root causes of drought and flood crises that threaten Somali communities, the Muslim World League is working to turn climate challenges into opportunities for safety and development. Learn about the “Beledweyne Canals Project,” which has restored safety to millions and brought growth back to the land.

    45039101621K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20261.8x their median

    Statement from the Muslim World League: https://t.co/7G6ZKtK85J

    479971158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.8x their median

    Highlights from the remarks of H.E. Sheikh Dr. Mohammed Al-Issa @MhmdAlissa, the Secretary-General of the MWL and Chairman of the Organization of Muslim Scholars, during the MWL event, AI for Everyone, featuring a range of thematic discussions, with the support and participation of the United Nations, during the High-level Week of the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly. #UNGA81

    4698102219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.8x their median

    Highlights from the remarks of H.E. Mr. Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed, Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, at the Muslim World League’s “AI for Everyone” event, which covered various themes and was held with the support and participation of the United Nations during the High-level Week of the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly. #UNGA81

    4691151172K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.7x their median

    Yesterday evening: As the “Guest of Honor” at this year’s UNHCR event—held in conjunction with the High-level Week of the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, and attended by the High Commissioner: H.E. Sheikh Dr. Mohammed bin Abdulkarim Al-Issa @MhmdAlissa, Secretary-General of the Muslim World League and Chairman of the Organization of Muslim Scholars, delivered an address at the opening session. He highlighted the significance of charitable work in Islam, outlining its distinctive features and legislative merits, and emphasized the importance of well-governed institutional charitable action. H.E. also outlined the League’s efforts to support and advance charitable work, with a particular focus on governance and coordination through direct cooperation with the relevant government authorities in each country. He commended the League’s cooperation with UNHCR in this regard, as well as its broader engagement with relevant United Nations organizations.

    463741227K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.6x their median

    Statement from the Muslim World League: https://t.co/4b5jiRFJHO

    38151150108K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 274 interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 100K times each, and 0.273% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

What is Muslim World League's engagement rate on X?
Muslim World League (@MWLOrg_en) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,158,846 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Muslim World League sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MWLOrg_en have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MWLOrg_en post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going