Back to @MTFutebol01's profile

M. Futebol engagement report

@MTFutebol01 - 132K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.558%
of 132K followers
Per impression
1.70%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
32.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
745
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 745 interactions against 132K followers, an engagement rate of 0.558%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 1.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

M. Futebol's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.558%, M. Futebol sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 280 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202618x their median

    🚨 AGORA! Clubes aumentam pressão com ameaça de PARAR O BRASILEIRÃO e ida ao STF contra Medida Provisória proibindo as bets. Na noite de ontem, dirigentes dos clubes intensificaram a articulação contra a MP e passaram a discutir uma medida extrema: PARALISAR O CAMPEONATO BRASILEIRO. A ideia surgiu durante a articulação para boicotar a reunião com o Governo, marcada para hoje e cancelada após boa parte dos presidentes avisar que não participaria. A possível paralisação tem dois objetivos. O primeiro é pressionar o Governo a oferecer mais que a linha de crédito a juros baixos, negociada antes mesmo da MP. Os clubes querem, no mínimo, um PERÍODO DE TRANSIÇÃO DE 6 MESES A 1 ANO para encerrar a publicidade das bets. O segundo é fazer a CBF ajudar na pressão sobre o Governo. E isso parece ter funcionado, já que uma paralisação afetaria o calendário do futebol brasileiro, que já está apertado. O Sinafut, que representa clubes e federações e tem forte influência da CBF, pediu ao STF para participar do processo aberto pelas bets contra a MP. Alguns dirigentes interpretam esse movimento como uma ENTRADA DA CBF no caso. Até clubes mais alinhados com o Planalto apoiaram o boicote à reunião com o Governo. É o caso do CORINTHIANS, que lidera as negociações pela linha de crédito a juros baixos e também negocia com a Caixa a quitação do financiamento de sua arena. 🗞️ @Estadao | @marcrizzo 📸 Lucas Figueiredo/CBF

    9.7K5921.4K1.8K2.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.9x their median

    Atenção 🚨 Apostadores terão até 23h59 do dia 5 de outubro para realizar todos os saques das casas de apostas. As casas ficam impedidas de aceitar novas apostas após a publicação da medida provisória. O restante será debatido na Justiça. Faz o L.

    4.5K15741686235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.9x their median

    Segunda-feira, espero vocês. https://t.co/WivhDmDLpc

    4.1K306321167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.2x their median

    Eu sei que vocês esperavam isso aqui… 1 minuto de silêncio https://t.co/FsENAdPtMc

    2.2K949513107K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.6x their median

    Sejam sinceros Caso as apostas esportivas sejam proibidas amanhã no Brasil, Vocês pretendem seguir a medida e realmente parar de apostar ou provavelmente vão procurar plataformas alternativas?

    1.6K626537234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.6x their median

    Esse seguidor teve a oportunidade de forrar de forma histórica com um bingo de R$ 5,00 Adivinha o que ele fez? https://t.co/vTGsoN9tWz

    1.8K171038246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.4x their median

    Bem amigos… terminou https://t.co/mAaXSEt6nW

    1.5K3022558164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.2x their median

    É… alguém em algum lugar do mundo deve ter pensado em alguma coisa. https://t.co/cEeA6bZoQp

    1.6K1456995K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.0x their median

    Vamos fazer uma pesquisa? Com qual número você está mais familiarizado? 13 ou 22?

    78777183135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.9x their median

    Me solidarizo com o Vinicius Júnior. Todo homem já viveu esse momento de se envolver com uma mulher que suga sua energia e atrapalha seu desempenho em outras áreas da vida.

    1.3K158221138K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 745 interactions against 132K followers, an engagement rate of 0.558%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 1.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is M. Futebol's engagement rate on X?
M. Futebol (@MTFutebol01) has an engagement rate of 0.558%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 131,685 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.558%, M. Futebol sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MTFutebol01 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MTFutebol01 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going