Back to @MMAFighting's profile

MMA Fighting engagement report

@MMAFighting - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 808 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
0.16%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
0.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
19
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
28.37/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 808 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.742% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 28.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 808 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 373x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ufc332, #ufc333, #ufc.

Measured over 808 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ufc332, #ufc333, #ufc.

Compared with accounts its own size

MMA Fighting's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, MMA Fighting sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link70% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 134 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 2026373x their median

    Sean Sharaf gives his immediate reaction to his 12-second knockout win over Gable Steveson at #UFC331: "God blessed me with that punch. … I don't put anyone on a pedestal. He's got two hands, and two legs, and he bleeds red. But I guess I shocked the world." https://t.co/l6SPZtm64G

    6.7K292397166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026180x their median

    Nate Diaz is becoming quite the fan of Tommy McMillen 🎥 @MikeHeck_JR https://t.co/0045qL29CR

    3.3K138168126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026140x their median

    Joshua Van gives his immediate reaction to his Fight of the Night win over Alexandre Pantoja at #UFC331: "He's a mental giant. He don't want to fall, and he don't want to show he's hurt. … That's why I respect him so much." https://t.co/rXVrtWTSua

    2.6K729152K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026127x their median

    Chute Boxe head coach Diego Lima pays an emotional tribute to the late Allan Nascimento: "The Diego Lima Institute, is not going to be called the Diego Lima Institute anymore. It’s going to be called the Allan Nascimento Institute." (🎥 @guicruzzz) https://t.co/ZZYXQv7m1o

    2.3K1061713110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026125x their median

    Dana White gives his immediate reaction to Joshua Van's win over Alexandre Pantoja at #UFC331: "He's the greatest thing ever for that division." https://t.co/TaX57YWO6e

    2.3K536344K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026102x their median

    #UFC champ Joshua Van sends QUITE THE MESSAGE to Manel Kape 👀 Could we see this title fight sooner than later? 🤔 https://t.co/aRp9CND4ss

    1.9K4825660K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202694x their median

    Andre Fili discusses not landing extra shots after Knockout of the Year contender at #UFCVegas122 over Kai Kamaka III 📰 https://t.co/Y1UgcaSRO3 https://t.co/kUaTmXmYaE

    1.7K7324966K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202689x their median

    (1/2) Renato Moicano argues he’s the perfect opponent to welcome Ilia Topuria back to the UFC "Ilia Topuria. That’s a name. He needs an easy fight, right? That’s the truth. We know how the UFC operates." (🎥 @guicruzzz) https://t.co/dGRSlS53mm

    1.6K355616137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202687x their median

    Song Yadong just put Umar Nurmagomedov to SLEEP at #UFCShanghai! Does the bantamweight division have a new No. 1 contender?? https://t.co/uYSfOzMPfr

    1.5K86521959K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202683x their median

    Conor Benn makes no excuses for his loss to Ryan Garcia #GarciaBenn https://t.co/in1XpAYipd

    1.5K2710243K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ufc332#ufc333#ufc#ufcvegas121#ufcedmonton

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 808 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.742% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 28.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 808 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 373x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ufc332, #ufc333, #ufc.

What is MMA Fighting's engagement rate on X?
MMA Fighting (@MMAFighting) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 808 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,599,174 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, MMA Fighting sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MMAFighting have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MMAFighting post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 28.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going