Back to @LxckTV's profile

LxckTV engagement report

@LxckTV - 96K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.235%
of 96K followers
Per impression
2.44%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
9.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
226
interactions (median)
Saved
0.081%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.235%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 2.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 107x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LxckTV's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.235%, LxckTV sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,816 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.674%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,816 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 201 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 26, 2026107x their median

    NFC CHAMPIONS šŸ† https://t.co/JNbVm1NYsh

    18K5.0K354577700K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202520x their median

    NBA 2K26 needs a defensive patch ASAP! please don’t wait an entire week/month to patch it. this is what ruins the momentum of the good starts @Beluba fix it please. Contest System needs buffed & defense needs a bit more of a stick to it, everything else is perfect!

    3.8K263386145990K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202512x their median

    Good morning... some more Q&A for you https://t.co/p89xThF17W

    2.3K13028596438K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202511x their median

    NBA 2K26 had a unannounced patch.. Things that feel changed - Dribbling on a Tall build such as a (6’8, 6’9, 6’10+) is back to being slow (feels like NBA 2K25) - Game speed feels like it’s slown down Hopefully it’s fixed.. cuz the game felt so good now it feels off

    2.2K6414236497K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 2025

    REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! REMOVE RHYTHM SHOOTING in NBA 2K26! ALSO REMOVE RNG PLEASE!

    1.8K16616043152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20259.3x their median

    NBA 2K26 IS 100% BETTER THAN NBA 2K25!

    1.9K1315016128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20257.0x their median

    Do you need NBA 2K26? Thinking about blessing a few more peopleā¤ļø

    1.1K66430451K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20256.3x their median

    NBA 2K26šŸ‘€ Who needs a copy? https://t.co/Z6OxvKLmeE

    1.0K57326362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.7x their median

    NBA 2K27 Crew XP needs a BOOST, 100%. I usually try to stay away from saying things need to be changed early on, but seriously… what do you mean I played for 8 HOURS yesterday and only got 200 XP? 😭 That progression needs to be bit faster.

    79135182103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20253.4x their median

    With NBA 2K26 Crew Levels not resetting. I hope 2K adds 20-25 levels onto the Crew Rewards per Season. That way crews don’t become stale & you have something to work towards. Seen Evan confirmed they don’t reset so @itsEvanCC any way you can pass this along & possibly consider?

    72420322110K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.235%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 2.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 107x its own typical post.

What is LxckTV's engagement rate on X?
LxckTV (@LxckTV) has an engagement rate of 0.235%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 96,138 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.235%, LxckTV sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,816 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LxckTV have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LxckTV post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going