Back to @Luxuriass's profile

πŸ–€ Luxu πŸ–€ engagement report

@Luxuriass - 255K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.279%
of 255K followers
Per impression
2.42%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
11.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
704
interactions (median)
Saved
0.072%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 704 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.279%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 2.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 38% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 55x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #deltarune, #γ‚«γƒŠγƒγƒ§γƒ­.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #deltarune, #γ‚«γƒŠγƒγƒ§γƒ­.

Compared with accounts its own size

πŸ–€ Luxu πŸ–€'s engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.279%, πŸ–€ Luxu πŸ–€ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 7, 202655x their median

    https://t.co/1WcYLXw4Og

    36K2.9K348470K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202442x their median

    Aqua x Terra childhood friend tropes??? You better believe I’m logged on πŸ™‚β€β†•οΈ https://t.co/e5UYyNxC2N

    24K2.2K749480K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 202634x their median

    Scotland has been eliminated from the World Cup. ❌ https://t.co/6FNJ1vz3BD

    22K5543641.1K1.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202629x their median

    Orihime 🧑 https://t.co/PaMbTyrl8n

    19K1.6K361129K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202619x their median

    🚨Former Bungie dev says a Destiny dating sim was actually made internally and was "very Dream Daddy inspired," but leadership was a "hard no" because they thought nobody wanted "romance or silliness" - https://t.co/uJ4f94q0Wr https://t.co/cBTYoyASg3

    12K5525905701.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202616x their median

    Guess who first-picked Aurora into a team of nothing but tanks https://t.co/q1eYs2tUG8

    10K74649170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202613x their median

    I like to imagine Aurora is covered in rune-like designs rather than just freckles https://t.co/lphXca5PER

    8.5K63139245K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202613x their median

    Is it too late to draw songus? https://t.co/Y4K8PcCiNd

    8.3K643343115K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202611x their median

    Being married is awesome because my wife lets me draw her as my oc in her cute outfits c: https://t.co/RJORI1CyZN

    7.4K44533087K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202611x their median

    She works as the receptionist in his office https://t.co/KQLUOs1cBG

    7.2K43635279K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#deltarune#γ‚«γƒŠγƒγƒ§γƒ­

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 704 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.279%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 2.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 38% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 55x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #deltarune, #γ‚«γƒŠγƒγƒ§γƒ­.

What is πŸ–€ Luxu πŸ–€'s engagement rate on X?
πŸ–€ Luxu πŸ–€ (@Luxuriass) has an engagement rate of 0.279%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 255,381 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.279%, πŸ–€ Luxu πŸ–€ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Luxuriass have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Luxuriass post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going