Luke Rudkowski engagement report
@Lukewearechange - 598K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 970 interactions against 598K followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Luke Rudkowski's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.162%, Luke Rudkowski sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 154.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 56K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 45K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 82K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 99K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 103K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 84K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 78K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 54K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 239K |
| Monday | 0% | 303K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 305K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 259K |
| Thursday | -2% | 251K |
| Friday | -3% | 260K |
| Saturday | +3% | 234K |
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 202622x their median
men given testosterone punished unfair players more severely and rewarded honest players more generously. https://t.co/Vd15ntns65
- Jun 27, 202114x their median
responsible flamethrower ownership https://t.co/6TccBvOmNH
- Aug 25, 202613x their median
-> introduces sugar tax -> it also taxes non-sugar drinks https://t.co/8IKIVamdSV
- Aug 25, 202610x their median
Days before the start of large-scale combat operations against Iran in late February, President Trump summoned his Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to the Oval Office in order to ask her if a war with Iran would work and successfully topple the Islamic Regime, according to the Wall Street Journal. Gabbard outlined running assessments from the U.S. intelligence community, telling Trump that killing Iran’s supreme leader would likely usher in a more hard-line regime open to acquiring nuclear weapons, while the IRGC would rush to close the Strait of Hormuz, destabilizing the global energy market, and strike U.S. forces and partners across the Middle East.
- Aug 24, 20266.0x their median
https://t.co/lEA4bcChM1
- Aug 18, 20262.8x their median
If we don't stop mass surveillance! We are all going to be slaves!
- Aug 11, 20261.9x their median
🇮🇱🇺🇸 Netanyahu rejects Trump's Gaza plan and vows Israel will stand its ground even against its best friends as Tehran floats waiting Trump out entirely The break is now public. At Sunday's cabinet meeting Netanyahu rejected the American 15-point Gaza plan outright, promised no withdrawal until Hamas is disarmed, pledged to stop Iran's nuclear program with or without any deal, and said it plainly: "we can and know how to stand our ground even against our very best friends." Same week, a statement read on-air from the adviser to Iran's parliament speaker floated skipping Trump altogether and dealing with the next president. Into this walks Alex Jones, connecting why the war structurally handed Tehran every card it now holds. Why Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan raced a defense pact to signature, the intelligence test he says exposed which capital they no longer trust, and the nuclear backstop he's tracked for fifteen years. His ground-war math, from Iwo Jima to the Pentagon's own estimates, lands on eight words about the strait: "It is designed to be a killing field." Then the story he saves for last, about oil executives who overruled their own engineers hours before Deepwater Horizon exploded, and why he hears the same phone call happening in Washington right now. @RealAlexJones
- Aug 20, 20261.9x their median
wait hold on, why are women supporting a mother that murdered 3 of her children? WTH like why is this going on, I don't get it? https://t.co/wzgcz3L1t9
- Aug 18, 20261.7x their median
Welcome in the Netherlands. If you want to have a healthy walk in the dunes or forests, you are obliged to buy a ticket. https://t.co/HLZuIEaYbE
- Aug 17, 20261.5x their median
We cooked and I think it’s all apart of the plan…… https://t.co/RtEYk6KLoJ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 970 interactions against 598K followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is Luke Rudkowski's engagement rate on X?
- Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) has an engagement rate of 0.162%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 597,908 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.162%, Luke Rudkowski sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Lukewearechange have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Lukewearechange post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.