Laurence Fox engagement report
@LozzaFox - 677K followers on X
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 677K followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 43x its own typical post.
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Laurence Fox's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.169%, Laurence Fox sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Aug 22, 202643x their median
One year ago today, Iryna Zarutska was murdered. This image of Iryna, terrified and in tears, as she realizes what had just happened to her and that the next few moments will be her last, tears my soul apart. In the midst of everything that’s going on, don’t forget about her. https://t.co/uoYUZIiSES
- Aug 30, 202622x their median
If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict. Because the law loves PRECEDENT. From that day forward, every job application is going to have a new question: “Are you currently hormonal?” “Well, I’m a woman.” “Thank you. I think we’ll be going in another direction.” You can’t carry a weapon anymore. No female police officers. Sorry, but we cannot hand a loaded gun to somebody whose legal defense might eventually be, “My hormones were acting up.” No more high-stress jobs, either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear-launch codes. One bad hot flash and boom 💥 Canada is glowing. And women definitely can’t be judges. How can you decide whether somebody else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people? No female politicians, either. You can’t be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government. And custody hearings are going to change overnight. The judge will say, “Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary. The children go with Dad.” Dad doesn’t know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician’s name or which one is allergic to peanuts, but his testosterone has never been successfully used as an insanity defense. Feminists spent a hundred years saying women are not hysterical, irrational creatures controlled by their biology and one defense attorney walks into court and says, “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury… have you considered the uterus?” You cannot demand equal authority and then ask for discounted accountability. If women want equal rights, great. But equal rights come with equal wrongs. Otherwise, that glass ceiling is about to become a padded ceiling.
- Aug 30, 202620x their median
Polish man kicks out Muslim men ‘praying’ in public: “You Muslim bitches think you can come here and start doing that shit. But not here, this is Poland! Go back home!” He knew they were not really praying, but trying to assert dominance. https://t.co/QFTkaTySaE
- Sep 1, 202611x their median
If the Lindsay Clancy verdict comes out in favour of it being ok for Lindsay Clancy to kill her children because *checks notes* she’s a hormonal woman, I hope men finally take back the leadership role in society. Fourth wave feminism is pure poison.
- Sep 1, 202611x their median
I have just been sworn in as the MP for Clacton. https://t.co/vwt5bFhBWc
- Aug 28, 202611x their median
“Those you invoke besides Allah can neither help you nor help themselves.” [Quran 7:197] https://t.co/2vOMgSqToQ
- Sep 11, 20238.9x their median
Nearly 3,000 New Yorkers died on 9/11; 22 years later, the death hasn't stopped. We mourn our neighbors who died that day. The hundreds of thousands who died in the wars that followed. The unknown millions injured & displaced. In their memory, we work toward a better world.
- Aug 31, 20268.6x their median
So arrest figures have been upgraded from 169 to 243 - but hey, there was apparently a great atmosphere and only a couple of non life threatening stabbing and a handful of sexual offences - that’s ok then…. and yesterday was the family friendly day https://t.co/zvVeVBotMq
- Aug 30, 20267.0x their median
Civil war is coming. Don’t make your kids fight it. https://t.co/mwplBTQUS3
- Aug 23, 20266.3x their median
“The truth is, however cynical you are about Meghan and Harry, it’s not cynical enough. Their jaw-dropping hypocrisy is only exceeded by their lack of self-awareness and contrition.” https://t.co/rAgzrXycbn
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 677K followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 43x its own typical post.
- What is Laurence Fox's engagement rate on X?
- Laurence Fox (@LozzaFox) has an engagement rate of 0.169%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 677,126 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.169%, Laurence Fox sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LozzaFox have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LozzaFox post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.4 posts per day across the measured window.