Louise Bagshawe engagement report
@LouiseMensch - 236K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 620 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.263%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 0.609% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #europetoday, #raffairford.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #europetoday, #raffairford.
Compared with accounts its own size
Louise Bagshawe's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.263%, Louise Bagshawe sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 425 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 202630x their median
LAS MALVINAS SON ARGENTINAS 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
- Sep 28, 202617x their median
I sincerely apologize. I misread the term "Muselmann" (Muslim) used in Nazi camps for prisoners at the brink of death, wrongly inferring that the term antisemitism originally meant hatred of all Semitic peoples. In fact it was coined specifically to denote hatred of Jews.
- Aug 29, 20265.2x their median
On the night of September 13, 2007, Navy SEAL Lieutenant Jason Redman was commanding an assault force outside Fallujah, Iraq, on a mission to seize a senior member of Al-Qaeda. As his team closed in, they walked into a well-laid ambush. Machine gun and small arms fire opened up, and Redman was hit repeatedly. Rounds tore into his left elbow, then a bullet punched through his jaw and exited his nose. In all he was struck seven times. Even after being shot, he kept fighting with his teammates. With almost no cover, they requested a “danger close” strike from an AC-130 gunship, one of the closest fire missions of the Iraq War. The aircraft’s guns broke the ambush. Every man on the team made it out alive. For his actions that night Redman received the Bronze Star with Valor and the Purple Heart. Recovery at Bethesda Naval Medical Center was long and brutal: 37 surgeries, some 1,200 stitches, 200 staples, and 15 skin grafts, and a tracheotomy. He lost his sense of smell and much of the use of his left arm. He refused to accept pity. On his hospital door he posted a bright orange sign: “Attention to all who enter here. If you are coming into this room with sorrow or to feel sorry for my wounds, go elsewhere… This room you are about to enter is a room of fun, optimism, and intense rapid regrowth.” The message spread far beyond the ward. President George W. Bush invited Redman to the Oval Office. The original sign now hangs in the Wounded Warrior ward at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, a standing reminder of the same resolve that brought his team home. Respect 🔱
- Sep 8, 20265.0x their median
I think it was another serious error for Meghan to issue an on the record statement that she was “surprised” by the King’s announcement. She had no right to be notified of it in advance at all. No right to edit it. Nobody wanted her opinion on His Majesty’s sovereign decisions. Saying she was “surprised” is a public protest against those decisions. If Meghan carries on in this way William’s wishes to remove all the titles are likely to carry the day. The King will not tolerate competing press releases for long, it looks like a rival court. He is King. @RoyalFamily If Meghan wishes to disobey him, he can remove Harry’s status as a Prince of the UK with a stroke of the pen, and I believe he would. She is playing with fire. Harry, in my opinion, deserves better than her petulant endangering of his standing. I hope Harry makes it clear to her that’s what she is doing.
- Sep 28, 20264.0x their median
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷U.S. official tells me: "President Trump is willing to give Iran sanctions relief and release of frozen funds for concrete progress on nuclear"
- Sep 5, 20262.8x their median
A lot of Reform UK supporters appear to have abandoned Nigel Farage’s disaster conference before his closing speech. Many, many empty seats https://t.co/gao0we2BwZ
- Sep 25, 20262.6x their median
It does seem like the only way to save the SAS is for everybody to start swearing in Marks & Spencer. I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules. https://t.co/UQ8eB0zaBW
- May 27, 2016
DEPORT https://t.co/Q3550bAxCs
- Sep 23, 2026
Zelensky: Recently, we sent two North Korean prisoners of war to the Republic of Korea. These guys are not easy to capture alive. One of them, when he realized he was going to be taken prisoner, tried to kill himself, and he was shocked that fate didn't let him die. Now, this is how they raise people in the North. It's reality. They take away their right to choose, and they drill into them that they must die, no matter what.
- Sep 7, 2026
I’m thankful the King has confirmed that Harry and Meghan *may not* use HRH. The Chamberlain’s letter is stronger than Buckingham Palace’s original announcement that they “will not” use HRH, calling the style “in abeyance”. Meghan was sending gift baskets “from HRH the Duchess of Sussex” and claiming she could do so if she used HRH “privately”. She (imo gleefully) published a letter from Ukraine addressed to “Your Royal Highness”. This letter confirms Meghan had no right to do either thing, and that the HRH is “in abeyance” meaning she cannot use it privately either. She can’t use it at all. Meghan’s fans have been falsely claiming their giving up HRH was a voluntary act on their part. The King @RoyalFamily today makes clear it’s NOT their choice and they have no HRH they can use privately either. I do want to note that, unlike Meghan, Prince Harry has never tried calling himself HRH after leaving royal duties that we know of. Personally, I think Prince Harry has behaved differently from, and better than, his wife, and I have much more time for him even though “Spare” was one of the greatest mistakes he ever made and is inexcusable. I also have compassion for Prince Harry; on a number of grounds he deserves some, not so, in my view, Meghan. At any rate, the King slapping down Meghan’s claim to be able to use HRH in any capacity is most welcome as a first step. @TheTimes correctly opens its story saying the Sussexes “must not” use HRH which is very different from merely “will not”. Prince Harry did serve his country when all is said and done. I am glad he’s come home and hope he gets to fully and completely reconcile with the King and, even though at present it seems unlikely, his big brother. If @oasis can do it there’s hope for everyone amIrite @NoelGallagher. However, Harry will be safer - and the country happier - if all the titles are taken away. It is the titles that cause 90% of the resentment towards the Sussexes. Most people feel if you leave the RF you should lose the deference that goes along with serving in it. This goes treble for leaving with great bitterness and insulting the rest of the Royal Family. My £0.02.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 620 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.263%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 102K times each, and 0.609% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #europetoday, #raffairford.
- What is Louise Bagshawe's engagement rate on X?
- Louise Bagshawe (@LouiseMensch) has an engagement rate of 0.263%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 236,045 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.263%, Louise Bagshawe sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LouiseMensch have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LouiseMensch post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.