Back to @LouiseAThompson's profile

Louise Thompson engagement report

@LouiseAThompson - 415K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 415K followers
Per impression
0.06%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 415K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Louise Thompson's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Louise Thompson sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 3, 202611x their median

    Why don’t people talk about how traumatic pregnancy and giving birth are?

    52430128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.8x their median

    It’s 4am and I’m lying awake wondering why the hell both Hayden Panettiere and Britney Spears were put on ‘happy pills’ when they were just children.

    6523039K viewsView on X
  • May 13, 20265.8x their median

    Straight from egg retrieval to recording 🎙️ This week got emotional… IVF updates, tough conversations, parenting debates & a few opinions that might divide people You can listen to the full episode here: https://t.co/wji8WKYnDt #ivf #IVFJourney #embryotransfer #ivfstory https://t.co/TgZCMKimad

    9131577K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20265.5x their median

    I don’t always feel confident in swimwear because of my stoma bag but this swimsuit made me feel like Ursula Andress which was a big slay You can shop it here 👇🏼 https://t.co/rmjYVOWOpI https://t.co/6EhDHt1eGI

    4310020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.1x their median

    I’m working on a piece of research, and I need your help. I’ve been let down by the maternity system and still don’t have answers about my own care. So, I want to gather other women’s experiences to uncover patterns and trends. What questions do you think need to be asked? 👇 https://t.co/38yyl1Jukv

    737014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.0x their median

    Every maternity trust in England has now been asked to report against 25 key maternity deliverables - a small step towards accountability. This is a reminder that change is possible when women keep speaking up and the right people keep listening. https://t.co/oC6QRPVGPz

    1321011K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20261.8x their median

    A woman messaged me last week to say she waited longer than an entire pregnancy to be seen by a maternal mental health practitioner. That sentence really struck a chord with me because if I had to wait 300 days then I don’t think I would have made it. https://t.co/v5m1Ff34Rk

    81414.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 2026

    Leo is four. He has more emotional intelligence than most adults I've met. Kids are completely feral and somehow the wisest people alive. Make it make sense.

    110006.4K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 2026

    I've used this incredibly cliché Kris Jenner quote four times this week, and I'll say it a fifth: 'If somebody says no, you're talking to the wrong person.' Turns out it applies to everything from fertility clinics to government bodies to my relationship with Ryan.

    101007.4K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 2026

    Being short and angry is just not a respected combination 🫠 #Petite #Petitegirl #Shortpersonproblems #Petitestyle #shortie https://t.co/7W8TZOQCfm

    101004.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 415K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Louise Thompson's engagement rate on X?
Louise Thompson (@LouiseAThompson) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 415,184 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Louise Thompson sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LouiseAThompson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LouiseAThompson post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going