Back to @LouieDi13's profile

B I G L O U I E šŸ«µšŸ¾ engagement report

@LouieDi13 - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.545%
57K views on a typical post
Reach
5.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
311
interactions (median)
Saved
0.002%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
7.27/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 0.545% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 181x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bet9jacode, #bet9ja, #usopen.

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bet9jacode, #bet9ja, #usopen.

Compared with accounts its own size

B I G L O U I E šŸ«µšŸ¾'s engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, B I G L O U I E šŸ«µšŸ¾ sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 2026181x their median

    Rest in power, Alhaji Taiwo Hassan. Icon, King, Ogogo! šŸ•Šļø https://t.co/2LEBa0KToJ

    48K7.7K416293665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026170x their median

    šŸšØšŸ“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ Savinho scores his first goal as a Tottenham Player. 🤩 https://t.co/ZKlaSHJdfK

    51K1.2K1812564.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202683x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Manchester City are showing an interest in Everton attacker Iliman Ndiaye. Everton value Ndiaye at around Ā£80m. Ndiaye also a name considered by #AFC, whose dream target remains Julian Alvarez. šŸ¤ @alex_crook https://t.co/36wmnbtXAQ

    23K1.5K5391.2K4.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202622x their median

    BREAKING: Duane Davis found guilty of killing Tupac Shakur https://t.co/Uq9815MsGu

    5.8K837154171484K viewsView on X
  • Nov 1, 202520x their median

    šŸŽ¬ Big news! @_timini Put me on the game again with @itscoastng šŸ”„, i can’t keep you off the great news, hence I’m sharing the sharp update with ya’ll. Crypto trading, gift-card swaps, bill payments, instant payouts, and more. Trust me—this is just the beginning with @itscoastng šŸ”— Get ready. Download the Coast app & start trading. App Store: https://t.co/v6DFv2Ucjz Play Store: https://t.co/1X2jZmQpw6 #UseCoast #Crypto4Cash #CoastFam #UseCoast4crypto

    3.9K1.7K449412.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202617x their median

    Bruno Fernandes is the greatest midfielder of all time. 🐐 I said what I said. https://t.co/eTqhDtbsgM

    3.7K672526228285K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202616x their median

    Two De@d After Machete-Wielding Man Storms IMAX Cinema in Lekki https://t.co/xppqrc5FlD

    4.2K395178294506K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202616x their median

    Who cashout 48k from 19k odds 😳

    4.4K29316112205K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.8x their median

    Be like I go hit 100 pts this weekend https://t.co/iw8iGpocKb

    2.5K13111514284K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20175.0x their median

    TRANSFER CENTRE: Deal for Victor Lindelof means Man Utd will no longer pursue Virgil van Dijk or Michael Keane https://t.co/ZwhkIBb2xO https://t.co/QACGcfmCqR

    1.4K40770180View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bet9jacode#bet9ja#usopen#afc#alwaysbet9ja

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 0.545% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 181x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bet9jacode, #bet9ja, #usopen.

What is B I G L O U I E šŸ«µšŸ¾'s engagement rate on X?
B I G L O U I E šŸ«µšŸ¾ (@LouieDi13) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 85 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,105,395 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, B I G L O U I E šŸ«µšŸ¾ sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LouieDi13 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LouieDi13 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 7.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going