Back to @Lord_Lombo's profile

Lord Lombo engagement report

@Lord_Lombo - 148K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.068%
of 148K followers
Per impression
2.06%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
101
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.2/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 148K followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 2.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 930K interactions, about 9209x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elcherma, #vinicius. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #elcherma, #vinicius.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.068%, Lord Lombo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 89 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 18, 20269209x their median

    🚹 BREAKING: JosĂ© Mourinho back to Real Madrid, HERE WE GO! đŸ’ŁđŸ€ All terms have been verbally agreed between JosĂ© Mourinho and Real Madrid, waiting to sign all documents. Plan for initial two year deal, JM to travel to Madrid after Real-Bilbao game. The Special One is back. https://t.co/K267WgiqjC

    799K88K20K24K112M viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20261027x their median

    Je veux prĂ©senter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfantĂ© la French Theory (qui a enfantĂ© la pire des merdes idĂ©ologiques : le wokisme). Nous avons donnĂ© au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'aprĂšs-68, nous avons donnĂ© Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriquĂ©, dans l'Ă©lĂ©gance de notre langue, l'arme idĂ©ologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident. Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseignĂ© que la vĂ©ritĂ© n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir dĂ©guisĂ©s en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution mĂ©dicale, l'Ă©cole, la prison, la sexualitĂ©, tout n'est qu'une mise en scĂšne de la domination. Derrida a enseignĂ© que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur rĂšgne. Deleuze a enseignĂ© qu'il fallait prĂ©fĂ©rer le rhizome Ă  l'arbre, le nomade au sĂ©dentaire, le dĂ©sir Ă  la loi, le devenir Ă  l'ĂȘtre, la diffĂ©rence Ă  l'identitĂ©. Pris isolĂ©ment, ce sont des thĂšses discutables. CombinĂ©es, exportĂ©es, vulgarisĂ©es, elles forment un systĂšme. Et ce systĂšme est un poison. Car voici ce qui s'est passĂ©. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversĂ© l'Atlantique. Les dĂ©partements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbĂ©s dans les annĂ©es 80. Ils y ont trouvĂ© un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme amĂ©ricain, sa culpabilitĂ© raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariĂ©e Ă  ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme. Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme acadĂ©mique. KimberlĂ© Crenshaw hĂ©rite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalitĂ©. À chaque Ă©tape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vĂ©ritĂ©, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiĂ©rarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identitĂ© est construite donc nĂ©gociable, toute majoritĂ© est coupable. VoilĂ  comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginĂ© leurs consĂ©quences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation Ă  une gĂ©nĂ©ration entiĂšre d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de lĂ©gislateurs. VoilĂ  comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mĂ©rite d'ĂȘtre dĂ©fendue, si le mĂ©rite existe, si la vĂ©ritĂ© se distingue de l'opinion. C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vĂ©ritĂ© accessible Ă  la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un hĂ©ritage Ă  transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par mĂ©chancetĂ©. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le rĂ©sultat est lĂ . Une gĂ©nĂ©ration entiĂšre a appris Ă  dĂ©construire et n'a jamais appris Ă  construire. Une gĂ©nĂ©ration entiĂšre sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une gĂ©nĂ©ration entiĂšre voit le pouvoir partout et la beautĂ© nulle part. Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilitĂ© particuliĂšre. C'est notre langue, nos universitĂ©s, nos Ă©diteurs, notre prestige qui ont donnĂ© Ă  ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la lĂ©gitimitĂ© de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idĂ©es n'auraient jamais traversĂ© l'ocĂ©an. Nous avons exportĂ© le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes. Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux oĂč des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les dĂ©construire, c'est la rĂ©ponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bĂątisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vĂ©ritĂ© existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiĂ©rarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre. Alors pardon. Et au travail.

    74K22K4.2K3.2K56M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202688x their median

    https://t.co/VppXPoAVfa

    8.7K232413178K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202531x their median

    Tu n’es ni en retard ni perdu(e). Tu es exactement oĂč Dieu te veut. Sois patient(e)!

    2.6K482442571K viewsView on X
  • May 7, 20268.2x their median

    Le PSG est la preuve qu’une fois que tu brises une malĂ©diction, ta vie va mieux. Ba ndeko il faut ko kata ba liens 😅 MDR.

    653131311324K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 20267.8x their median

    Tant que Perez est président rien n'arrivera à Kylian. Il n'est pas fou. Et il vient de dire à tout le monde qu'il est du cÎté de Perez dans les prochaines élections. Depuis qu'il a aimé la publication annonçant Mourinho je pense qu'il a brisé sa relation avec Arbeloa.

    6857223723K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    Jude Bellingham est le meilleur milieu de terrain du monde.

    25128211212K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20262.9x their median

    Sur vos Ă©crans, Lord Lombo AKA Gabriel Omar Batistuta ⚜ renard de surface. Buteur maison. Soki na tiaki sĂ©rieux na balle heure oyo na LĂ©opards 🐆 coupe du monde 😅 https://t.co/i0ZfBZ3IOy

    255931116K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20262.9x their median

    Perez stp ramÚne Olisé à Madrid et je te pardonne les deux saisons blanches. Quel joueur! Bravo Kylian

    247291307.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20262.6x their median

    «La bĂȘtise insiste toujours. On s’en apercevrait si l’on ne pensait pas toujours Ă  soi ». Albert Camus (La Peste, 1947).

    2242510211K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#elcherma#vinicius

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 148K followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 2.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 930K interactions, about 9209x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elcherma, #vinicius. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Lord Lombo's engagement rate on X?
Lord Lombo (@Lord_Lombo) has an engagement rate of 0.068%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 147,968 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.068%, Lord Lombo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Lord_Lombo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Lord_Lombo post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going