Back to @LonnyRapAllowed's profile

L Da Vice engagement report

@LonnyRapAllowed - 252K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 252K followers
Per impression
0%
616 views on a typical post
Reach
0.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 616 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.245% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions. Recurring topics include #hiphop, #news, #atlanta.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #hiphop, #news, #atlanta.

Compared with accounts its own size

L Da Vice's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, L Da Vice sits below the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 214 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026

    Kool Aid & Frozen Pizza - Mac Miller (2010) 🔥🔥 Produced by Lord Finesse R.I.P Mac 🕊️ https://t.co/mYbPgn3Cmp

    2.4K593195670K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Rapper The Game was posing with radio personality Big Boy and others while displaying a "Black and Brown" unity T-shirt when he pranked Big Boy by putting a Bloods red bandana on his head. That made Big Boy freak out and scared. 😂 https://t.co/aQq0v1Q1v9

    2.6K1595923526K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    "Those who take the risks you dare not take live the life you long to live." — Socrates https://t.co/h2r9zSP8ZU

    1.4K223191522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    What’s your favorite albums from Ice Cube (@icecube) all-time❓ https://t.co/7MwAdxqxdW

    1202149176.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Biggie always had the ladies locked in back in the '90s. The aura was just different. https://t.co/tx9WDI2XVz

    16916135143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    The Biggest Upsets in Boxing History: When the Impossible Happened 🥊😳 https://t.co/b9fsmnH1mb

    5740722.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    If somebody can either cannot meet up with you call you and talk to you do a video chat or some type of tangible meeting then they are not real and they are fake and they're trying to fake you.

    2100401 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Its basically You against pictures of famous people and Ai and stadards you cannot acheive.

    20001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Alright. Im starting to plateau. Time to Blow out my Legs with Squats. That will make me hungrier.

    1000522 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Watch out for all the pictures that ARE NOT of you. They want to study the one whi came before and drive it into the ground. Even if you did get famous....to reach those standards of success is so crazy....

    1000631 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hiphop#news#atlanta#begging#boosting

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 616 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.245% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions. Recurring topics include #hiphop, #news, #atlanta.

What is L Da Vice's engagement rate on X?
L Da Vice (@LonnyRapAllowed) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 251,835 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, L Da Vice sits below the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LonnyRapAllowed have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LonnyRapAllowed post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going