Back to @LomahCrypto's profile

Loma engagement report

@LomahCrypto - 318K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.198%
of 318K followers
Per impression
0.962%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
20.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
630
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 630 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.198%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 0.962% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Loma's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.198%, Loma sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 280 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 14, 2025130x their median

    HODL https://t.co/sQysm4i88t

    52K5.3K6.3K3.2K14M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202633x their median

    JUST IN: Leaked internal reasoning reveals Claude Fable 5 “muttering and grumbling” to itself in a language of its own.

    15K8854313621.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202626x their median

    bro i just learned that quantum physics is crazy as f*ck…because WDYM every possible outcome of every choice you make ACTUALLY does happen, it just splits into a parallel timeline. does that mean the one youre observing NOW is the one you already EXPECTED to land in?? so quantum leaping isn’t forcing an outcome, it’s simply changing what we expect in the moment??

    14K1.7K185150426K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202622x their median

    Strategy has increased its USD Reserve by $450 million. As of 7/12/2026, we hodl ₿843,775 in our BTC Reserves and $3.0 billion in our USD Reserves. $MSTR $STRC https://t.co/OdFbjLuCTP

    11K1.2K1.0K4042.9M viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 202621x their median

    The “dead internet theory” in action In World of Warcraft, a server without humans has appeared — instead, 1,800 DeepSeek-based bots are playing there. The bots behave like regular players: they chat, level up characters, run dungeons, and even fight each other. As a result, the game world looks completely alive.

    9.8K5843051422.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202613x their median

    JUST IN: U.S. LAUNCHES STRIKES AGAINST IRAN.

    6.0K2782581401.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20269.0x their median

    🚨 BLOODBATH in Asian Markets Over $800 BILLION wiped out from Asian stock markets in just a few hours amid a massive tech stocks sell-off. South Korea's KOSPI down -8.2%, wiping out over ₩587,000,000,000,000 ($426 BILLION). Japan's NIKKEI down 2.8%, wiping out approximately ¥32,500,000,000,000 ($217 BILLION). TAIWAN's stock market down -3.5%, erasing NT$161,000,000,000,000 ($154 BILLION).

    3.5K783213162615K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 20245.0x their median

    Time to start sharing trades and (current) market thoughts again. Won’t always be right.. but if people can undisclosed shill shit liquidity memecoins under the guise of “helping” people, I guess I can try to provide some form of value in return. We’re so back.

    2.3K767759483K viewsView on X
  • Jan 21, 20255.0x their median

    The top is always when your most retarded friend makes like $300k in a day

    2.8K7220026270K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.4x their median

    Seeing a bunch of newly minted millionaires on-chain, here’s Uncle Loma’s unsolicited advice: 1. You don’t have as many friends as you think 2. Money does buy happiness 3. If you’re retiring, pick up a social physical hobby 4. Mechanism of compounding now works heavily in your favor 5. Getting rich in a short period means you probably didn’t increase your cost of living. Be mindful of this. 6. Helping friends/fam is great but you cannot help people more than they’re willing to help themselves

    1.9K1408523252K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 630 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.198%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 0.962% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

What is Loma's engagement rate on X?
Loma (@LomahCrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.198%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 318,082 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.198%, Loma sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LomahCrypto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LomahCrypto post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going