Back to @Loboemerson's profile

emerson engagement report

@Loboemerson - 228K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 228K followers
Per impression
0.542%
6.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
35
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 228K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.5K times each, and 0.542% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 1300x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

emerson's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, emerson sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video53% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20261300x their median

    vi um vídeo no ttk de uma mulher falando do date q ela teve, foi na casa do cara era imunda ,ele pediu um lanche, tinha um refri ele só tinha um copo e pegou para ele e deu um POTE de margarina p menina colocar o refri p beber, ela ficou sem reação e só aceitou aquilo Depois veio o gato miando no pé dela, em cima dela quase e ela não sabia o porquê aí ele fala que o pote de margarina tava com a água do gato KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK O GATO FOI ATRÁS FO POTE DELE KKKKKKKKKKKKK

    42K1.7K662714815K viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 2024358x their median

    - vamos com calma? - vamos - ... - e se a gente for pra bahia?

    10.0K1.5K215796641K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026276x their median

    Eu / minha colinha 🇧🇷 https://t.co/TYmSP2PCUM

    7.8K1829466723.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026248x their median

    Eu faria loucuras pelo PRENSADO DE PARMEGIANA. https://t.co/MWKzPuUQou

    7.3K4252107571.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026208x their median

    Se eu quiser roubar uma senhora pra comprar uma cervejinha, eu posso✅ Se eu quiser virar político e roubar dos aposentados, eu também posso✅ Se eu quiser apostar o MEU dinheiro para o MEU time vencer um jogo do Brasileirão, eu sou proibido❌ E tem gente que defende.

    5.7K907586139165K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026137x their median

    🎙️ ENTREVISTA | Bap diz que fim das bets causará prejuízo de R$ 400 milhões só ao Flamengo https://t.co/fed4QQJWrs

    2.7K4621.0K6461.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026106x their median

    Petistas eu NÃO vou votar em lula no primeiro turno, podem me assediar o quanto quiserem. Se for o caso ainda voto nulo no segundo só pra estressar vocês mais

    1.3K661.2K1.1K392K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026105x their median

    e essa maninha aqui chamada Lim You de 14 anos em um jogo contra a arábia saudita fez 7 gols sendo 6 de fora da área https://t.co/KzyrUflODW

    3.1K133310142649K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202662x their median

    O assunto já deu, mas só respondendo ao SOUZA, que tem zero moral: Coutinho não abriu mão de milhões. ELE SAIU PORQUE QUIS. Não foi o Vasco que o mandou embora! Críticas no futebol são perfeitamente normais. Vegetti também foi criticado no final e hoje ainda tem MUITA MORAL! 👍🏼 https://t.co/kpXEvY5FXW

    1.6K60330182896K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202646x their median

    Quem você prefere como titular do Vasco logo mais: David ou Spinelli? 📷 Matheus Lima | Vasco https://t.co/G7l0M56jhK

    1.1K11388134121K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 35 interactions against 228K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.5K times each, and 0.542% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 1300x its own typical post.

What is emerson's engagement rate on X?
emerson (@Loboemerson) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 227,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, emerson sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Loboemerson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Loboemerson post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going