Liz Wheeler engagement report
@Liz_Wheeler - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 83 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 83 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 83 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 117K interactions, about 376x its own typical post.
Measured over 83 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #papeàparis.
Compared with accounts its own size
Liz Wheeler's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.029%, Liz Wheeler sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 42% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 47% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 20, 2026376x their median
La solution 🐷 https://t.co/ipgaTQaXDF
- Sep 21, 2026352x their median
🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting after a 22-year-old who runs into BURNING BUILDINGS as a volunteer firefighter was told he isn't qualified to be a paid firefighter... ...because he was HOMESCHOOLED. Then the city changed the job posting to cover it up. His name is Andrew Coates. He's 22 years old, in Nebraska. Right now, today, he runs into burning buildings as a volunteer firefighter for Cedar Bluffs Fire. He is a state-licensed EMT. He is doing the job. For free. All he wanted was to get PAID to do it. In his words: "Make a career out of it would be the goal. To get paid to do what you love." So he applied to the Fremont Fire Department. And in April, the city rejected him. Why? Because his high school diploma says he was homeschooled. That's it. That's the whole disqualification. Not his EMT license. Not his fitness. Not his record. Not his experience pulling people out of fires ALREADY!! ...how he was educated. The job posting he applied to said "graduation from high school." That's all it said. He graduated high school. He has a diploma. And AFTER they rejected him, the city went back and added the word "accredited" to the job description. His own fire chief, the man who has watched Andrew work, showed up to defend him: "I feel the city of Fremont is really missing out here, and in my mind, because of his homeschooling, you guys are discriminating against him." Over THIRTY homeschool families showed up to stand behind this kid. And the Civil Service Commission? They said it isn't their job to touch city policy. Homeschoolers are literally a generation of kids who read ABOVE grade level, who work with their HANDS, who volunteer in their communities, who show up for their neighbors. And this young man is the proof. At 22, he's a certified EMT and a volunteer firefighter, while plenty of his peers are on a couch. When your house is on fire at 3 a.m., I promise you will not ask the man dragging your children out where he went to high school. You will not ask if his diploma was accredited. You will thank GOD he came. Andrew isn't even fighting for himself anymore. His words: "I think now it's turned into we want to make sure that every homeschooler has an equal opportunity." That's a better man than the policy that rejected him. Fremont, you have a licensed EMT and an active firefighter begging to serve your city. And you turned him down over paperwork, then rewrote the paperwork to cover it. Fix this. Hire him!!!!!!!
- Aug 16, 2024180x their median
America was founded as a Christian nation. Prove me wrong. https://t.co/F6Iw3SbLNy
- Sep 12, 2026241x their median
Wake up, New York. The hour is later than you think. 🗽 🇺🇸 https://t.co/ktHecXw95Y
- Oct 4, 2026178x their median
Ironic how the women posting “I am Jane Doe” didn’t post anything about the 250,000 British white girls who were systemically gang raped by Muslim men.
- Oct 22, 2026121x their median
There is a literal coup against President Trump being plotted as we speak. 1,600+ former USAID employees, military, state dept diplomats, & foreign policy officials are planning violence for after the midterms. If Democrats win the House & Senate, the plot will be activated. DSA “foot soldiers” will take to the streets, instigating violence clashes with Trump law enforcement agents. They intend their violence to provoke Trump into invoking the Insurrection Act. If Trump invokes that law, the thugs plan to seize power from the federal govt in a “doomsday scenario” deletimizing the federal govt and giving power to Democrat governors in blue states. Then they plan to impose their “structural reforms” on the country. A “refounding” they call it. They mean impose communism on you. They also plan for a “breakthrough” to happen to take Trump out between now and Jan 3. This plot appears to be the brainchild of color revolution experts like Erica Chenoweth, and others who worked at USAID. Honestly it BLOWS MY MIND that some people are gonna sit out the midterms. Not vote. Are you crazy? Literal communists who hate you and want to kill you are plotting to overthrow our govt, steal your vote and topple the president you elected. Who, by the way, is THE ONLY PRESIDENT IN HISTORY who has successfully obliterated USAID, the institution that produces these color revolutions aimed at YOU. I get it, gas prices are too high. For sure. But are you out of your mind to throw away your midterm vote when the choice is between USAID thugs who are trying to stage a violent coup and topple our country and President Trump who DOGE’d USAID and cut off the funding that went from USAID to the NGOs that pay for the left wing color revolutions aimed at you??? I truly don’t get how anyone could skip voting in the midterms. I’d crawl over broken glass to give Trump’s agenda to dismantle the deep state two more years. And, you know, save our country and civilization from the violent death of communism. Just think, you wouldn’t even know about this coup plot if not for @DataRepublican. You might have skipped your vote, handed Congress to the Democrats and suddenly faced… revolutionary communist violence.
- Oct 21, 2026119x their median
BREAKING: the federal search warrant against Ilhan Omar names her as "Ilhan Nur Said Elmi, a/k/a Ilhan Abdullahi Omar," indicating that DOJ believes she is present in the United States under a false identity! Revealed in a scheduling order today from DDC https://t.co/rMzqHPoTfF
- Sep 26, 2026110x their median
Kindergarten requirements for 1954 https://t.co/zmmKxByNG0
- Sep 29, 202694x their median
Here's one thing I'm confused about re: the Cornell rape case: The DA says that the reason his office didn't bring charges is that Jane Doe told police that what happened was "voluntary, conscious, and consensual." But like... who is going to the police station to report voluntary, conscious, and consensual group sex? Obviously that's not what she thought it was.
- Aug 25, 202684x their median
Tried to do sleep training tonight for the first time. Dude, I can't do it. The way you're supposed to just leave as she's screaming Dada is AWFUL. No soothing, no rocking, nothing. F that. I'll rock her to sleep till she's 21 years old, I DGAF. 0/10 don't recommend.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 83 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 83 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 117K interactions, about 376x its own typical post.
- What is Liz Wheeler's engagement rate on X?
- Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 83 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,090,180 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.029%, Liz Wheeler sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Liz_Wheeler have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Liz_Wheeler post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.5 posts per day across the measured window.