Liz Wheeler engagement report
@Liz_Wheeler - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.572% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 161x its own typical post.
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Liz Wheeler's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.015%, Liz Wheeler sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Aug 25, 2026161x their median
Tried to do sleep training tonight for the first time. Dude, I can't do it. The way you're supposed to just leave as she's screaming Dada is AWFUL. No soothing, no rocking, nothing. F that. I'll rock her to sleep till she's 21 years old, I DGAF. 0/10 don't recommend.
- Aug 23, 2026147x their median
Researchers at Fred Hutchinson examined the brains of 59 women after death. In 63 percent of them they found male DNA, almost certainly left behind by a son. The oldest of those women was 94, and the cells were still sitting there. Around week four or five of pregnancy, before most women have told anyone, a handful of the baby's cells cross into the mother's bloodstream. Some of them never leave. Scientists call it microchimerism, meaning you are carrying a few of another person's cells inside you. Doctors at Leiden University in the Netherlands checked organs from women who had recently been pregnant and found the baby's cells in every single one. Liver, lungs, thyroid, kidneys, bone marrow, skin, heart. They do not sit idle. When researchers in Ireland biopsied cesarean scars from 70 women, they found the baby's cells living in the skin as ordinary skin cells, making collagen and repair proteins right at the cut. The child helped close the wound its own birth made. At Mount Sinai, scientists tagged fetal cells with a glowing marker in pregnant mice, then damaged the mothers' hearts. The fetal cells went to the injury. They became heart muscle and the lining of blood vessels. Nobody has proven the human version yet, but doctors have noticed for years that women who develop heart failure around childbirth recover better than almost any other kind of heart failure patient. In a study of 177 women, fetal cells appeared in the blood of 85 percent of the healthy participants and only 64 percent of the women who had a very early, non-invasive breast cancer. Nobody has worked out yet whether the cells are doing the protecting. The same cells also turn up in Hashimoto's, an immune condition that attacks the thyroid, so this is a gift with complications. A French team looked at umbilical cord blood in 2021 and found cells belonging to the baby's grandmother in 5 of 28 samples. Cells that crossed one placenta decades earlier had crossed a second one. Three generations of women, alive in a single bloodstream. Which means the pull a mother feels toward her child has a physical form. It sits in her liver, her heart, and often her brain, and it stays there for the rest of her life. https://t.co/zy6gM4x5tl
- Aug 4, 2026124x their median
Glenn Beck: “Donald Trump is changing the New World Order entirely and it won't be fully understood for probably another five to ten years.” "He's completely redesigned the entire world. He has made a bigger impact than any other president, maybe since Lincoln. He becomes one of the most impactful presidents of all time, if it works. That jury is still out, but if it works, he changes the entire course of the world." @glennbeck explains how this is happening and WHY people refuse to see it.
- Aug 8, 2026100x their median
Did you know that George Floyd said "I can't breathe" 8 times before he was ever on the ground? 8 times before Derek Chauvin ever touched his neck. 8 times before that viral video on Facebook—that sparked the so-called Summer of Love and the Black Lives Matter riots in Minneapolis—was ever even filmed. Did you know the medical examiner found no evidence of strangulation or damage to the neck in George Floyd's autopsy? Author TJ Harker explains:
- Aug 25, 202657x their median
The three babies were face down in the basement so Lindsay Clancy couldn’t see their faces as she strangled them to death. Christ have mercy. Any woman defending or “empathizing” with Lindsay Clancy should be ostracized from society. Don’t date her. Don’t marry her. Do NOT have children with her. Don’t even hire her. It’s the only way. We cannot permit such evil from the deepest pit in hell to infiltrate our society. Those with the demonic gall to “support” Lindsay Clancy should be punished. The babies were Face. Down. as they screamed and died.
- Jul 28, 202655x their median
Fauci did this. Even though he KNEW it was bullsh*t. It’s beyond cruelty. Watch this and tell me Fauci doesn’t belong in a prison cell. https://t.co/PTKSSVwGIH
- Jul 27, 202638x their median
NEW: On page 302 of the new personal records of Dr. Fauci released by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Fauci complains that in 2013, HHS didn't let him do a CNN television interview because of "pure jealousy", adding that it was because he's a "rockstar" who was "stealing their thunder." https://t.co/Ue1JtefVph
- Aug 21, 202626x their median
If you care more about Natalie Harp’s devoted, harmless letters to Trump than you do about Peter Strzok & Lisa Page’s treasonous text messages plotting to weaponize the FBI to stage a coup against President Trump… Then you are falling for the psy op.
- Aug 19, 202624x their median
The reason the left is attacking Natalie Harp is because she’s a pretty blonde girl who loves America & excels at her job. The fact that she’s grateful to Donald Trump for something good he did for her... The left can’t STAND it. Because the left HATES a happy conservative woman. She refuses to be a miserable ugly Kamala feminist. She refuses to be controlled by the left. And the “pro-choice” left REVILES the choices of women who reject the choice the LEFT wants them to choose. God forbid word get out to women that it’s possible to be happy, healthy, Christian and conservative. It’s a threat to the left’s ENTIRE grisly ideology. Badge of honor for Natalie, just by nature of living of her life fully, to trigger them so.
- Aug 25, 202623x their median
Postpartum depression can be real. Psychosis too. SSRIs are dangerous. Doctors irresponsible. Big Pharma criminal. It’s STILL evil from the pits of hell to strangle three babies face down so you don’t see their eyes while you murder them. Why is this difficult to comprehend?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.572% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 161x its own typical post.
- What is Liz Wheeler's engagement rate on X?
- Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,093,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.015%, Liz Wheeler sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Liz_Wheeler have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Liz_Wheeler post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.