Back to @LizGillies's profile

Elizabeth Gillies engagement report

@LizGillies - 2.7M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 2.7M followers
Per impression
0.823%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
297
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 297 interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 88% of tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.823% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 147x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Elizabeth Gillies's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Elizabeth Gillies sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 28, 2025147x their median

    IT'S REAL!!! The Sims 1 AND The Sims 2 are being rereleased for Windows 10/11 on JANUARY 31!!!!! https://t.co/j3nPE4vzAE

    35K3.8K4814.3K5.1M viewsView on X
  • Apr 5, 2025109x their median

    ‘THE PITT’ Season 2 will take place over a Fourth of July weekend. (Source: Deadline) https://t.co/Z7z4bZitMB

    28K1.7K3382.3K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Nov 23, 202473x their median

    Me in the theater after the lights came back on at the end of Wicked https://t.co/onpnACnzZl

    19K2.5K23139621K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 202547x their median

    the only gothic couple ever 🖤😈 https://t.co/BXx0oJgWhY

    13K5321523611M viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202531x their median

    Elaine Hendrix and Alan Bersten deliver one of the most powerful dances that I’ve ever seen on Dancing with the Stars. 👏 #DWTS #DWTS34 #WickedNight https://t.co/DtZfILOlJk

    8.3K63226123255K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 202528x their median

    HBO building is going to look so good with this one the side https://t.co/DcoMPbidwK

    7.8K40911152286K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 202528x their median

    does it ever drive you crazy just how fast the night changes 🥺 https://t.co/bU2Km3B3s6

    7.4K69881093.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 202526x their median

    ‘Liz the season! After sixteen years, @LizGillies is BACK on the musical theater stage. #LittleShopNYC https://t.co/wcR8igpqWJ

    6.8K45868433334K viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 202524x their median

    So wait…is this Sims thing really happening? Do we have a date? 👀

    6.9K18010356277K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 202519x their median

    🤠 https://t.co/zQQHCV9GOi

    5.4K2133738116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 297 interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 88% of tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.823% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 147x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Elizabeth Gillies's engagement rate on X?
Elizabeth Gillies (@LizGillies) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,662,694 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Elizabeth Gillies sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LizGillies have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LizGillies post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going