Liz Ann Sonders engagement report
@LizAnnSonders - 847K followers on X
Measured over 96 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 847K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 96 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.246% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 96 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 109x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inflation, #morningtradelive, #lizannlive.
Measured over 96 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #inflation, #morningtradelive, #lizannlive.
Compared with accounts its own size
Liz Ann Sonders's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.006%, Liz Ann Sonders sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 2026109x their median
Ferris Bueller’s Day off meets let the bodies hit the floor. These two shouldn’t work that’s good together. https://t.co/DcsyvzMsV5
- Dec 4, 202445x their median
I hate that I keep having to post (and pin) this, but anything you think you see (or hear) via AI-generated fake videos from “me” on this platform, Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and/or Bluesky claiming I have a stock (or crypto) picking club for a fee are all IMPOSTERS … I am ONLY active on this platform (make sure you’re following the actual me, not the scammers) and LinkedIn … I’m not active on ANY OTHER platform
- Aug 20, 202618x their median
S&P 500 stocks with dividend yields > 10-year Treasury yields hit a record high of 63.4% (excluding COVID-19 crash) back in July 2016 … a decade later, that figure has fallen to less than 4%, lowest since May 2007 @NDR_Research https://t.co/oHDsuKpmch
- Aug 27, 202611x their median
Initial jobless claims down to 203k vs. 208k est. & 207k prior (rev up from 206k); continuing claims 1.778M vs. 1.792M est. & 1.796M prior (rev down from 1.799M) … greatest increases in KY (+518), OH (+342), & UT (+74k); greatest decreases in MI (-2.5k), CA (-1.4k), & SC (-1.1k) https://t.co/ZgHwCjBttc
- Aug 27, 20268.7x their median
July goods deficit widened sharply to $118.8B vs. $100.5B est. & $101.4B prior (rev. from $101.5B) https://t.co/VEr6rJBwcH
- Aug 27, 20268.4x their median
Sectors’ % of stocks trading at 4w and 52w highs https://t.co/iG7INseyHM
- Aug 28, 20268.4x their median
Our latest #OnInvesting podcast episode has dropped, on which @CollinMartinCS and I dish on markets, Fed vs. Treasury, and Warsh’s big speech this morning https://t.co/kSm66BDdyE
- Aug 27, 20268.4x their median
In year/year terms, corporate profits soared in 2Q26 and increased +22.8% vs. +12.8% prior, highest since the post-pandemic rebound of +27.9% in 4Q21 https://t.co/22OeGwDLKS
- Aug 27, 20267.9x their median
Baskets’ performance https://t.co/6K7rBv07SB
- Aug 27, 20267.6x their median
Sectors/indexes yesterday and MTD/YTD https://t.co/gAWwM9QW7D
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 847K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 96 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.246% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 96 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 109x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inflation, #morningtradelive, #lizannlive.
- What is Liz Ann Sonders's engagement rate on X?
- Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 96 original posts from the last 30 days against 847,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.006%, Liz Ann Sonders sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LizAnnSonders have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LizAnnSonders post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.