Back to @LiveFPLnet's profile

LiveFPL engagement report

@LiveFPLnet - 133K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.167%
of 133K followers
Per impression
0.496%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
33.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
222
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 222 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 0.496% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LiveFPL's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.167%, LiveFPL sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 202628x their median

    LiveFPL is staying for 26/27! Thanks everyone who reached out, I appreciate your support. I think there is still value LiveFPL can offer to the community. Effective Ownerships, What if scenarios, safety scores, expanded league data, custom leagues, threats and differentials, events effects and more. An enhanced web planner is coming too. I will evaluate the situation better through the season. I am not going to predict price changes via my model anymore (RIP model) but will see if I can add more insights to the official predictions. Seeing FPL adopt live features eight years after LiveFPL introduced them feels like a validation of the work I’ve put in over the years. Although I had no involvement in their implementation, I’m incredibly proud of the influence LiveFPL has had on the game and the experience it created for millions of managers. LiveFPL continuing for the long term will depend on the finances. If you want to help us stay, you can subscribe on the app (link pinned in profile) Ragabolly/LiveFPL

    5.3K36432780317K viewsView on X
  • Dec 29, 202517x their median

    🚨It's finally here! LiveFPL mobile app is LIVE NOW! Live Rank, accurate Price Predictions, What-if tool, Live Leagues + Compare your Team to FPL celebs and a revamped Transfer Planner and more βœ… iOS https://t.co/LhjVQYXE3M Android https://t.co/ioucMYJm8D Collaboration with @FFScout

    2.9K3704281661.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202614x their median

    A personal confession: transparent price changes is such a relief for my mental health! I used to obsess and stress daily about my LiveFPL predictions, double n triple check it for all sorts of errors, panic if a predictions goes wrong. Now I am freeee Ragabolly of LiveFPL ❀️

    3.0K26832121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202612x their median

    Bruno cappers (~22%) are in heaven. No Bruno teams (~40%) are in shatters.

    2.6K572510118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20269.1x their median

    One of those iconic FPL moments https://t.co/bruYsfR2tp

    1.9K112151445K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.5x their median

    8.9 million accounts registered for FPL GW1 in 2026/27, down from 9.5 million at the start of last season. Good luck to everyone for the new season!

    1.6K47321280K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.0x their median

    Hi all πŸ‘‹ Just re-iterating something from pre-season. LiveFPL is not going to run its model for predicting price changes, I will just use the official data πŸ™ There is no point in trying to reverse engineer the algorithm when its results are officially public. And it takes an IMMENSE amount of work to maintain the prediction model. Right now seems the official predictions are all stuck at exactly zeros, hopefully that is not a long term issue.

    1.5K20350106K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20266.7x their median

    Soon https://t.co/zcVMIP60w0

    1.4K295810231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.2x their median

    Top 20 countries playing FPL! Find your country count and rank at https://t.co/BKUv1Q17ea What's your country rank? https://t.co/UiYJSNGiXy

    75975743183K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.9x their median

    Okay now the LiveFPL ecosystem should be fully functional. Sorry for any bugs and delay. Enjoy the weekend 🌹

    8051541243K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 222 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 0.496% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is LiveFPL's engagement rate on X?
LiveFPL (@LiveFPLnet) has an engagement rate of 0.167%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 133,465 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.167%, LiveFPL sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LiveFPLnet have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LiveFPLnet post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going