Back to @Lisk's profile

Lisk engagement report

@Lisk - 594K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 594K followers
Per impression
0.503%
8.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
45
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 594K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 0.503% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lisk's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Lisk sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 242 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 22, 202514x their median

    Max Kordek returns as full-time CEO and goes all in on Lisk. Today, we’re strengthening Lisk with a bigger team, increased funding, and full support behind our mission. @maxkordek is returning as CEO to lead this next chapter. Full announcement 👉 https://t.co/HzUVj94s6h

    20958511061K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.4x their median

    https://t.co/UaU2AXNKJw

    10724531284K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.2x their median

    We have begun to burn 100M LSK Tokens, aiming to reduce the overall LSK supply from 400M to 300M tokens. This results from the successful passing of our DAO proposal. Here is why, and what it may mean for you. 🧵 (1/7) https://t.co/VKYWssVMAb

    1202337921K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.1x their median

    Lisk is entering a new chapter. Ten years brought us to today, and what lies ahead has never been more exciting. Here’s what you should know, and what it means for you, whether you’re a finance professional, Lisk builder, or LSK holder and DAO member. https://t.co/Nd2cUiC7Jf

    12229151751K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.7x their median

    Important: users holding funds on Lisk Chain must bridge to Ethereum before its closure on October 31st. The withdrawal takes ∼8 days. Unlocking and unstaking adds another 3-day waiting period. Lisk stakers can now unlock their staked LSK, with no penalty (link in bio). https://t.co/QKX1fFZWf0

    1032338429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.6x their median

    Lisk is becoming the modern money operations platform for finance teams. As part of that shift, the Lisk Chain is winding down, and we've set up an optional migration path to @Celo for builders currently deployed on Lisk. Here's what you need to know as a Lisk builder 🧵 (1/9) https://t.co/ZCUBjKgaGB

    1132192037K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.6x their median

    A 100 million LSK burn has just been completed, as a result of the recently passed DAO proposal. In consequence, total LSK supply has been reduced from 400 million to 300 million. https://t.co/YTg5NBTzjf

    982237441K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.3x their median

    Welcome to Celo, @Lisk builders! Thanks to the founders who joined @Marek_, @GigaHierz & the Celo Core Co. team to introduce yourselves & kick off your migration 💛 https://t.co/sSDPLrC8Ee

    116188735K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.3x their median

    Because user experience matters: we created USDL, issued by @Stablecoin, a @stripe company. Here's why, and how it brings peace of mind to Finance teams 🧵 (1/6) https://t.co/NuTUS7I0GD

    661122526K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.0x their median

    Reminder: users holding funds on Lisk Chain must bridge to Ethereum before its closure on October 31st. The withdrawal takes ∼8 days. Unlocking and unstaking adds another 3-day waiting period. Lisk stakers can now unlock their staked LSK, with no penalty (link in bio).

    551121222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 594K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 0.503% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Lisk's engagement rate on X?
Lisk (@Lisk) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 594,215 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Lisk sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Lisk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Lisk post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going