Back to @LisaNEdwards's profile

Lisa N Edwards engagement report

@LisaNEdwards - 137K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 137K followers
Per impression
0.853%
4.6K views on a typical post
Reach
3.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.853% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #btc.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitcoin, #btc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lisa N Edwards's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Lisa N Edwards sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 141 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 202652x their median

    I don't envy people anymore after watch this https://t.co/myzFdj2fPw

    1.7K243261392K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202617x their median

    Quick update as to why I’ve not been around, I’m staying at the hospital with my Dad until he heads to heaven 😇 He’s fought a hard battle with cancer and doesn’t want to go 🥲but everything is starting to fail 🙏send him a prayer please ♥️ https://t.co/4TMUDsfy3e

    5372117113K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20239.3x their median

    https://t.co/KGG84LcZmI https://t.co/Zcn5KLArlN

    25861423329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.0x their median

    My Dad is now at peace 🤍 When we were talking while he was still alive and he said he didn’t believe in an afterlife and I said there’s more I think we’re a spirit or an energy in a human body having a human experience learning and evolving our soul and I said give me a sign when you go and he said always look for the 888 but he said I’ll try to give you other signs and you’ll know… He did one better! I said to Google maps when I entered my address “Dad take me home your way” he took me down Frederick St♥️♥️♥️

    259251110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.6x their median

    Lots of $BSV requests 🤟🤩🤘 in the subwaves NOW - BSV must hold 15.2 to remain bullish then the potential pattern on my chart should play out! 🚀🚀🚀 https://t.co/dffVtz6f5P

    1343115113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.3x their median

    $TURBO soonnnn 🐌🐌🐌 https://t.co/2ymPafh1z9

    96171605.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.0x their median

    What $ALTS do you want me to look at for you i’ll do a few charts later today🚀🚀🚀

    4626908.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.3x their median

    $XRP confirmed this [attern 🚀🚀🚀 https://t.co/W9orzLkqPU

    795608.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.3x their median

    Subscriber alert, not sure if anyone uses this or has issues: https://t.co/12fJiK3MtT

    67611526K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.0x their median

    Found this photo of me at my dad‘s house… how Australian? 🇦🇺🐨🌏 https://t.co/X9S6fTCpeT

    683804.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin#btc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.853% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #btc.

What is Lisa N Edwards's engagement rate on X?
Lisa N Edwards (@LisaNEdwards) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 137,444 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Lisa N Edwards sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LisaNEdwards have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LisaNEdwards post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going