Back to @Linhtailor2's profile

Linda.🅔🅣🅗🇻🇳 engagement report

@Linhtailor2 - 63K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.14%
of 63K followers
Per impression
7.15%
1.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
82
interactions (median)
Saved
0.174%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 7.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Linda.🅔🅣🅗🇻🇳's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.14%, Linda.🅔🅣🅗🇻🇳 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 202622x their median

    Cô trở về từ Đài Loan với mong muốn tạo bất ngờ cho gia đình… nhưng không ngờ chính mình lại nhận một bất ngờ đau đớn nhất. 💔 https://t.co/qnjx27pgnk

    1.7K32720675K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.2x their median

    GM 𝕏 fam 𝕏 is for everyone.,😍😍😍 Người mới cũng build. Người cũ vẫn build. Không ai biết chính xác mình sẽ đi được bao xa. Cứ ở lại, cứ làm thật. 🫡 https://t.co/KLtiHW9ieZ

    1292011323.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.9x their median

    Lên cho chị em kiểu gội đầu làm mưa làm gió 2026 đây 😆💦 Gội đầu thôi mà cũng phải có phong thái, có thần thái mới chịu nha! 😂 https://t.co/7qYE0iDwJC

    1121810057.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.5x their median

    Tay không bắt giặc… à nhầm, bắt ong! 🐝😂 Một pha xử lý nhìn thôi đã thấy hồi hộp. Anh em tuyệt đối không nên làm theo nhé 😅 https://t.co/BpXolAkMAT

    1651626132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Hôm nay được đi ăn sinh nhật đứa bạn, thế là vừa có dịp gặp nhau vừa được ăn ngon 😋 Menu nay cũng khá hấp dẫn, toàn món Thái: phở xào Thái, Súp chua cay Thái với Thịt nướng 🌶️🍜🥩 Không cần gì cầu kỳ, ngồi ăn uống, tám chuyện với nhau một chút… vậy thôi mà thấy vui và ấm áp ghê❤️🌿

    52125714.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Trêu chồng một chút, đổi lại là cái ly vào người. Đau cả thể xác lẫn lòng.... Người . 😡 https://t.co/osTWEuFPyc

    4653011.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Hôm qua ở quán chị gái mình có nói một câu là ngồi bắc chân lên bàn nhìn hơi thiếu ý thức. Thế mà người ta tự ái 😅 Nay quay lại vẫn đúng cái tư thế đó. Thôi thì chắc mỗi người có một tiêu chuẩn về “lịch sự” khác nhau thật https://t.co/NU6qwHrLlm

    413370891 viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Đọc mà thấy tiếc thật sự. Có khi lúc bắt đầu cũng chỉ nghĩ “vào chút thôi, Gỡ nhanh rồi trả nợ”, ai ngờ một cú đòn bẩy lại kéo mọi thứ đi xa vậy. Đam mê crypto không có gì xấu, chỉ là lúc đang nợ thì càng phải tỉnh. Tiền mất đã đau, nhưng đừng vì tiếc 60 triệu mà lại vay thêm để gỡ. Đừng để một lần cháy biến thành cả một vòng nợ...

    336320891 viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Bữa tối đơn giản nhất thế giới của tôi. Ăn nhẹ nhàng đi ngủ cho khỏe chứ nay mệt quá trời https://t.co/16HfYzTXHQ

    244221925 viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Xem “Trại buôn người” đã thấy ám ảnh, nhưng đọc lời kể của một nạn nhân từng bị bán sang Myanmar rồi trốn thoát còn kinh khủng hơn nhiều. Bạn ấy kể lại trải nghiệm trong phần bình luận của một bài tìm người mất tích. Mọi người share cho bạn bè, con em mình đọc để biết mà cảnh giác. Có những thứ biết sớm một chút có thể cứu mình cả đời.

    243210370 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 7.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Linda.🅔🅣🅗🇻🇳's engagement rate on X?
Linda.🅔🅣🅗🇻🇳 (@Linhtailor2) has an engagement rate of 0.14%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 62,841 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.14%, Linda.🅔🅣🅗🇻🇳 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Linhtailor2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Linhtailor2 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going