凌汐 No.1 engagement report
@LingXiDom - 171K followers on X
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.025%, 凌汐 No.1 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 30, 202612x their median
抽菊花近距离版 虽然好使 但孩子几下就崩溃了 求抱抱摸摸了 @Heweihu8101 道具来自 https://t.co/9vdY0K7Wp3
- Sep 1, 2026166x their median
隔着衣服被踩&撩开衣服被踩 小狗会更喜欢哪个呢? https://t.co/F21tR8vbTd
- Jun 6, 20262.9x their median
乖 腿打开哦~ 嗯?又合住? 我要生气了哦~ https://t.co/DWJmE5cRgF
- Aug 13, 202682x their median
瑟瑟留住晚上发! 哎嘿? 怎么会有水这么多的孩子 刚刚放上去就喷了呢 其实前后四五次 没成功拍下来 一整张尿垫全湿为结束 https://t.co/1P8D78OK4G
- Jul 23, 20262.2x their median
猫蛋蛋制作流程~ 强高后在最敏感的时候扇b! 手扇还是拍子随意 别太用力 重点是别放过她就好 但其实 最最重要的是 需要小狗本身就要有一个小小的 对称的阴cun 所以没这个效果的小朋友被太在意了哦~ https://t.co/BJNWokyMMx
- Jun 16, 20261.5x their median
一组重工具正常使用和回锅对比! 其实他已经很厉害了 完全热开身之后我这么大力道孩子都不翻滚了 都夸夸她哦! 但是!回锅!小盆友们一生之敌! 没几下她就开始表演求饶,死皮赖脸蹭抱抱 道具来自@Heweihu8101 https://t.co/8fFzhzR6kC
- Aug 5, 202646x their median
不用多说 只要是大字绑 永远都有抽小p的一席之地! https://t.co/3fAbFi4aQM
- Jun 3, 2026
透明小裤裤穿了就好像掩耳盗铃似的 虽然我看得见 我还是觉得碍事 拔掉! 孩子是怎么做到热身就乱跑的呢 翻滚 团成🥚 捂pp 你放心吧 我是不会放过你的 什么都没用哦 https://t.co/VhTi14g5j4
- Sep 14, 202636x their median
在小狗不停的向前guyong逃避之下 她成功的把自己塞进墙角小缝隙里了 被拯救之后 依旧是 挨打! https://t.co/dg8huYDZim
- Sep 6, 202635x their median
被逼到角角里 瑟瑟发抖 也跑不掉被打pp的命运! https://t.co/3CtIMtVxFC
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is 凌汐 No.1's engagement rate on X?
- 凌汐 No.1 (@LingXiDom) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 170,593 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.025%, 凌汐 No.1 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LingXiDom have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @LingXiDom post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.