Back to @LindseyStirling's profile

Lindsey Stirling engagement report

@LindseyStirling - 433K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.14%
of 433K followers
Per impression
3.80%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
608
interactions (median)
Saved
0.165%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 608 interactions against 433K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lindsey Stirling's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.14%, Lindsey Stirling sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 21, 20264.9x their median

    Just when you thought Skrillex Bangarang couldn’t get any more chaotic #edm #dubstep https://t.co/4BPNJP1knB

    2.5K292973097K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.3x their median

    Thanks for all the love on the King of Coins music video. I always love longer performance takes even when they don’t fit in the cut. So here’s one I found when editing. https://t.co/Q1KUHPuGPg

    2.4K225381645K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.5x their median

    I used a small clip of this take in the edit but here is another fun longer performance that couldn’t fit in the edit for the King of Coins music video https://t.co/yhDWUfdj7R

    1.9K17233733K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20262.3x their median

    So meaningful to celebrate AAPI culture with @GoldHouseCo at this years #GoldGala in a stunning gown by Vietnamese designer Vungoc & Son! https://t.co/a7zkOK09rE

    1.3K6470747K viewsView on X
  • Feb 5, 20262.2x their median

    After years of talking about it, @ChrissyCostanza and I did it. https://t.co/RBPSnVoEs5

    1.2K11924830K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.7x their median

    It makes me emotional to announce this residency in Vegas because it’s the reclaiming of an old dream; something I wanted so so badly but I was told I couldn’t have it I’m so grateful to you fans for seeing my potential. @VenetianVegas tix on sale now! https://t.co/xpuhj0qpat https://t.co/z66H9BbG41

    8709942924K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 20261.6x their median

    So excited to come to Latin America this fall for the Duality tour! https://t.co/jHdIYpfuc5

    8855726641K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 20261.6x their median

    Surprise! The Surrender visualizer is out now: https://t.co/cFIM2eFJTi https://t.co/vuy9md9TZf

    813112271327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.5x their median

    If you haven’t watched the music video yet… Go watch it! I was flirting so hard with that camera. https://t.co/bAkvAjiV73

    8305728321K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 2026

    I learned how to play Serenity Found backwards so we could capture this in-camera without any special effects. The video is out now… let me know what you think 🌊 https://t.co/N9bpeO9Umc

    69777461222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 608 interactions against 433K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

What is Lindsey Stirling's engagement rate on X?
Lindsey Stirling (@LindseyStirling) has an engagement rate of 0.14%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 432,968 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.14%, Lindsey Stirling sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LindseyStirling have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LindseyStirling post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going