Linda Grasso engagement report
@LindaGrass0 - 171K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 4.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 151 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Linda Grasso's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.055%, Linda Grasso sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 92% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 227 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 27, 20261.6x their median
In energy, intelligence should be judged by what it improves, not by how advanced it sounds. The Digital & Intelligent Energy Systems theme at ADIPEC 2026 gets to the point: performance must be proven in real operations. Join > https://t.co/w9vnyE9fl5 @ADIPECOfficial Partner. A model can look impressive in a lab. An engineer has to know whether it can be trusted on an operating asset. That gap between promise and practice is where technical exchange matters. Across 200+ sessions and 1,100+ expert speakers, the ADIPEC Technical Conferences will bring together the people who design, operate and improve energy systems every day. I am most interested in the conversations that examine AI against real-world requirements: reliability, safety, integration and clear human accountability. Only then does intelligence become performance. Energy. Intelligence. Impact. #ADIPEC2026 #ADIPEC #Energy #AI
- Aug 13, 20261.6x their median
I believe the quality of an energy conference is reflected in the people willing to bring their decisions, experience and varied perspectives into the same room. ADIPEC 2026 is building exactly that kind of conversation. Join > https://t.co/w9vnyE9fl5 @ADIPECOfficial Partner. What interests me is the mix of leadership behind the agenda. Wael Sawan of Shell, Patrick Pouyanné of TotalEnergies and Meg O’Neill of bp bring the perspective of major energy operators. Christian Bruch of Siemens Energy and Olivier Blum of Schneider Electric add the technology and infrastructure side. For me, this is where the value of ADIPEC 2026 is clear. Energy decisions are increasingly connected to industrial systems, digital capability, capital and long-term resilience. When leaders responsible for different parts of the energy system meet in the same place, the conversation can move closer to decisions with real operational and economic consequences. Energy. Intelligence. Impact. #ADIPEC2026 #ADIPEC #Energy #Leadership
- Jul 14, 20261.6x their median
AI is becoming an energy infrastructure question. Data centers, computing demand and power systems are increasingly connected. At AIxEnergy, co-located with Gastech 2026, this convergence is the focus. Register > https://t.co/RBwQKyN7Bf @GastechEvent Partner #Gastech #Energy Artificial intelligence is often discussed as if it were mainly a digital issue. In my view, the more human question is different: what kind of physical infrastructure are we building around AI, and who will benefit from it? AI growth needs energy systems that can support data centers without putting reliability and affordability under unnecessary pressure for businesses and communities. AIxEnergy, co-located with Gastech 2026, brings these two worlds into the same conversation: those building computing infrastructure and those responsible for the energy capacity behind it. If AI is going to scale responsibly, the energy side cannot remain in the background.
- Aug 18, 20261.5x their median
Energy infrastructure is now an economic strategy. Rising demand and volatile supply put resilience under pressure. At Gastech 2026 in Bangkok, leaders will discuss how policy and industry can respond. Register > https://t.co/RBwQKyN7Bf @GastechEvent Partner. #Gastech #Energy Resilience used to sound mainly like a technical requirement. Today it reaches much further, into industrial competitiveness and the continuity of services people depend on. One discussion in the Gastech Strategic Conference agenda caught my attention: “Building the energy system backbone: Resilience, flexibility and dispatchable power.” It is a very practical question. Can energy systems keep working under pressure while remaining reliable and economically sustainable? The wider speaker line-up adds another dimension, with H.E. Akanat Promphan, Minister of Energy of Thailand, and Tengku Muhammad Taufik, President & Group CEO of PETRONAS, among the confirmed leaders bringing policy and industry into the same conversation. I believe this matters. Resilient infrastructure ultimately depends on decisions that can move from strategy into real-world implementation.
- Jul 27, 2026
An internet outage doesn't just disrupt connectivity—it disrupts business. Payments, cloud apps, customer service and operations can all be disrupted. Learn how @TMobileBusiness is rethinking connectivity resilience > https://t.co/yL8UUj72QQ T-Mobile for Business Partner https://t.co/lk3nV0JDm1
- Aug 18, 2026
Think a backup internet provider automatically means resilience? Not necessarily. True business continuity depends on independent connectivity paths. Discover how T-Mobile for Business is rethinking connectivity resilience > https://t.co/K7WwFhFgZE @TMobileBusiness Partner https://t.co/P4WxXH6hU5
- Jul 17, 20261.5x their median
https://t.co/JhLNjXEool
- Sep 25, 2026
💡 The workplace is evolving faster than ever. The question is: are your skills evolving with it? The most resilient professionals won't necessarily be those who know the most today. They'll be the ones who never stop learning. Follow @LindaGrass0 for more insights 💡 https://t.co/I6I6DSa0Sn
- Aug 28, 2026
For decades, expertise meant accumulating knowledge, mastering processes, and relying on past experience. But AI is changing the rules. Today, the most valuable professionals aren't those who know the most—they're the ones who can adapt the fastest. Follow @LindaGrass0 for more insights 💡
- Sep 4, 2026
One of the biggest risks with AI isn't that it's wrong. It's that it can sound absolutely right. The organizations that get the most value from AI won't be those that trust it blindly—they'll be those that know how to challenge it. Follow @LindaGrass0 for more insights 💡 https://t.co/4YuUV80vRP
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 4.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 151 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.
- What is Linda Grasso's engagement rate on X?
- Linda Grasso (@LindaGrass0) has an engagement rate of 0.055%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 170,987 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.055%, Linda Grasso sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LindaGrass0 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LindaGrass0 post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.