Back to @Limportant_fr's profile

L'important engagement report

@Limportant_fr - 316K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 316K followers
Per impression
0.777%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
30
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 316K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.777% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 1442x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #rediff, #news.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #rediff, #news.

Compared with accounts its own size

L'important's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, L'important sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 20221442x their median

    Nika Shakarami, 17ans, a disparue lors d'une manifestation contre le régime. Une semaine plus tard, les forces de sécurité ont rendu son cadavre, nez et crâne fracassés @AlinejadMasih https://t.co/L5kSUwlZSI

    28K13K1.6K727View on X
  • Sep 1, 202612x their median

    RDC. Des milliers d'enfants travaillent dans les dangereuses mines de cobalt, pour un salaire dérisoire, afin que nous puissions conduire nos voitures électriques et utiliser nos smartphones @wideawake_media #Rediff https://t.co/TCWPZhTqXM

    19014751210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.8x their median

    Wakati Joseph, professeur tanzanien: «Mon rêve est de voir ces enfants aller loin dans la vie» @BBCAfrica https://t.co/8dBCttEelc

    20158326.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20267.9x their median

    Inondations au Népal. L'armée a sauvé plus de 300 travailleurs et résidents piégés à l'intérieur d'un tunnel hydroélectrique @washingtonpost https://t.co/OR3dmyMr2d

    18450038.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.5x their median

    Belgique. La Flandre-Orientale interdit le port du voile et des autres signes convictionnels dans ses écoles provinciales https://t.co/oVBrT67AfC @rtlinfo https://t.co/4Vu2VDds6i

    11743424.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.1x their median

    Canada. Jessica s'est fait tatouer un clavier QWERTY sur l'avant-bras afin que son fils autiste non verbal ait toujours un moyen de communiquer avec elle @GoodNewsMVT https://t.co/0Yjnvs07Md

    7019318.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.7x their median

    Mutilations génitales féminines: plus de 230 millions de femmes et de filles vivent encore avec leurs conséquences https://t.co/dk7BYmvdWn @droitaucorps https://t.co/dFELp1djeY

    3442226.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    «Quel enfant de quatre ans mérite de subir ça ?» : une mère dénonce des violences envers sa fille placée en famille d'accueil https://t.co/uwdjGHrniy @LyesLouffok https://t.co/AF7RHmpJpx

    4929016.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    Vendues comme épouses, perdues en mer: le trafic des jeunes filles rohingyas apatrides https://t.co/CJwAAsCLdi @globalvoices https://t.co/MltpgJGksA

    4225122.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.2x their median

    Ce fauteuil roulant permet à l'utilisateur de se tenir debout @InterestingSTEM #Rediff https://t.co/OGxh8JvPxl

    4320222.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#rediff#news

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 316K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.777% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 1442x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #rediff, #news.

What is L'important's engagement rate on X?
L'important (@Limportant_fr) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 315,957 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, L'important sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Limportant_fr have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Limportant_fr post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going