Back to @LilaGraceRose's profile

Lila Rose engagement report

@LilaGraceRose - 422K followers on X

Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.286%
of 422K followers
Per impression
6.81%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
4.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.143%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.286%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 6.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lila Rose's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.286%, Lila Rose sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.699%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,381 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 262 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202615x their median

    These twin sisters, Kyrie and Brielle Jackson, were born prematurely at just 28 weeks. Both were extremely small and fragile. Kyrie grew stronger, Brielle's condition worsened — she reportedly turned blue and had an irregular heartbeat. Doctors feared she wouldn't survive, so a nurse took an unconventional approach for the time and placed both twins in the same incubator. Once they were together, Brielle's breathing improved, her heartbeat stabilized, and her color returned. Love is the greatest medicine.

    17K1.2K142581.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202610x their median

    Born without legs and arms. Most people would have labeled him “inconvenient” and aborted him. He’s not a clump of cells. He’s a human being worthy of life. https://t.co/pQf0f7uIIs

    11K1.1K30140150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.1x their median

    BREAKING: New Jersey Governor Miki Sherrill signs a bill effectively preventing Christians from praying outside abortion facilities This is a violation of the First Amendment rights of pro-life Americans. No person should be punished for praying for the unborn. https://t.co/N7mDemzZkw

    8.0K2.1K783211265K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.9x their median

    Jess is a survivor of sex trafficking. Her abuser got her pregnant. But she fought for her baby’s life. Jess gave her son up for adoption at 3 months old. Watch her meet him for the first time in 20 years… https://t.co/rITMKiv1RE

    8.5K85912065223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20267.3x their median

    BREAKING A George Soros-backed law firm is threatening @LiveAction, demanding we retract statements where abortion is described as “killing” preborn children. Our answer is No. Threats will not stop us from calling abortion what it is or from fighting for the right of every child to live. We will not be pressured into using language that hides what abortion does or makes the killing of a preborn child easier to accept.

    7.0K1.6K2227261K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.2x their median

    A Virginia bishop just did something never done before. Bishop Michael Burbidge ordered every priest in his diocese to read a letter at Mass, exposing a ballot question that would allow abortion up to birth. Dismembering fully developed children in the womb is not “healthcare,” it’s murder.

    7.1K1.4K1475192K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20267.1x their median

    83-year-old Brigitte Stegemann, a devout Christian grandmother with stage 4 stomach cancer, was euthanized against her will, despite repeatedly refusing euthanasia due to her faith. Her family alleges she failed a basic cognitive test, wept that she’d “made a mistake,” and died with her hands clasped in prayer after a botched IV left her covered in blood. Euthanasia is state-sponsored murder.

    6.3K1.8K35213298K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.8x their median

    Deanna Lynn Galante was 7 months pregnant with her preborn son, Matthew. She was in the North Tower on 9/11. Her husband said the night before they were watching their baby move. Today we remember Deanna, her preborn baby, and all the innocent lives lost in the Twin Towers. #NeverForget

    7.3K84865854K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20266.6x their median

    Doctors pressured this boy’s parents to abort him five times. They claimed that, because of his disabilities, he “wouldn’t survive.” His parents refused. Davey Bates was born with a severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. He had a 15% chance of survival.  After surgery, he is now a healthy, thriving little boy and just celebrated his first day of school. No diagnosis should be a death sentence for a child.

    7.0K943512652K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.9x their median

    A culture of life is built through moments like this.  Monique, a United flight attendant, saw an exhausted mother who desperately needed rest and had accidentally fallen asleep with her baby in her lap. Instead of criticizing her, she offered to care for her baby while she got some much-needed rest. This is the kind of compassion our culture needs more of.

    6.5K461742287K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.286%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 6.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Lila Rose's engagement rate on X?
Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) has an engagement rate of 0.286%, based on the median interactions across 68 original posts from the last 30 days against 422,431 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.286%, Lila Rose sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LilaGraceRose have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LilaGraceRose post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going