Back to @Lexii__G's profile

Alexis Kierra 🩶 engagement report

@Lexii__G - 263K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.037%
of 263K followers
Per impression
3.24%
3.0K views on a typical post
Reach
1.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.134%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.2/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 3.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 176K interactions, about 1836x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chrisjohnson, #elizabethpeña, #peopleapp.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #chrisjohnson, #elizabethpeña, #peopleapp.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alexis Kierra 🩶's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, Alexis Kierra 🩶 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 59 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20261836x their median

    Taylor Lautner & Taylor Lautner have welcomed their first child, Lennon Taylor Lautner. https://t.co/1ImD95RaEd

    170K4.7K4321.5K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261148x their median

    Her: I am so wet. Me inside the condom: https://t.co/FLAs3SphEO

    102K7.1K4671.0K7.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026290x their median

    Mood https://t.co/ml99akPMTR

    24K3.6K117692712K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 2026214x their median

    When y’all haven’t seen each other https://t.co/fK56mJMYeD

    17K2.6K723731.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026198x their median

    Khloe Kardashian and Scott are dating for those who don’t know that’s her sister Courtney Kardashian, baby daddy 😳 https://t.co/gvZtOIzq0k

    17K3117576454.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026177x their median

    if they paint you as a villain, pose.

    12K4.0K76458327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026169x their median

    HAVE YALL EVER LIVED COMPLETELY ALONE NO KIDS NO SPOUSE NO ROOMMATES NO ANIMALS JUST YOURSELF?

    12K6511.0K2.7K699K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026136x their median

    Remembering Elizabeth Peña on her birthday Today we celebrate the incredible Elizabeth Peña, born 67 years ago. 🌟 From Mirage in The Incredibles game to her work in Prototype, her legacy continues to inspire. Let's honor her memory! #ThisDayInGaming #ElizabethPeña https://t.co/Kn1ulqQoqW

    12K9851091151.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026131x their median

    This is the hardest one • What you know about Nino Brown and G Money? https://t.co/Cgm5CibxRx

    10.0K2.1K252258471K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202656x their median

    Uggs being $200 is the biggest recession indicator

    4.6K50145205494K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chrisjohnson#elizabethpeña#peopleapp#thisdayingaming

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 3.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 176K interactions, about 1836x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chrisjohnson, #elizabethpeña, #peopleapp.

What is Alexis Kierra 🩶's engagement rate on X?
Alexis Kierra 🩶 (@Lexii__G) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 263,469 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, Alexis Kierra 🩶 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Lexii__G have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Lexii__G post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going