Levi Conely engagement report
@LeviConely - 254K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 254K followers, an engagement rate of 0.748%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 5.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Levi Conely's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.748%, Levi Conely sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.697% to 2.61%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 96% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 75 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 1, 202618x their median
Seven properties, a Mercedes G-Wagon, sneakers worn by Kobe Bryant and a Mickey Mantle rookie card worth $1.5 million. All of these things were bought with taxpayer money. Paul Randall pleaded guilty in one of the largest Medicaid fraud schemes in the California history – diverting more than $270 million in tax dollars.
- May 25, 202110x their median
Inflation is about to kick a lot of people's butts and most are blissfully unaware of the true implications of that.
- Aug 14, 20269.7x their median
CREEPY FACT: Jeffery Epstein made the rooms "weird" so when his victims would try and explain the rooms to police, they would sound crazy and the police would've believe the victims. DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN. HIS VICTIMS DESERVE JUSTICE. https://t.co/Faev8vbcaW
- Aug 25, 20262.7x their median
:) https://t.co/H2c3jeE2XM
- Aug 25, 20262.5x their median
Health is wealth 😇 https://t.co/r3QN4abRzd
- Sep 7, 20262.2x their median
https://t.co/WACdg4Tz0k
- Aug 30, 20262.2x their median
https://t.co/GHqWUwIXNl
- Aug 29, 20261.7x their median
Miss me? 😏 https://t.co/v5KBgQFnzw
- Sep 11, 20261.7x their median
Surprised myself on the track today 🔥 https://t.co/uHVsNlDO7A
- Sep 15, 20261.6x their median
Always good seeing my favorite barber 🤝 https://t.co/h0mHSgsbtk
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 254K followers, an engagement rate of 0.748%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 5.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
- What is Levi Conely's engagement rate on X?
- Levi Conely (@LeviConely) has an engagement rate of 0.748%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 254,274 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.748%, Levi Conely sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LeviConely have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LeviConely post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.