LeveragedInfo engagement report
@LeveragedInfo - 120K followers on X
Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 120K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 439 times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.366% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49 interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
LeveragedInfo's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.007%, LeveragedInfo sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 292 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 23, 20266.1x their median
🚀 ALTCOINS COULD HAVE 14X UPSIDE THIS CYCLE @cryptomanran says prior cycles saw altcoins outperform Bitcoin by 5x to 7x, which is why he doesn’t view a 14x outcome as absurd. “this number doesn't seem so absurd” https://t.co/0oqXD70Shf
- Sep 24, 20265.9x their median
All eyes are on bond yields But the real story is your bank account Same balance But soon your idle cash becomes T-bill plumbing Digital cash to you More debt capacity for them https://t.co/HG9dKySkwf
- Sep 21, 20263.3x their median
🚀 FOMO TO HIT 150M USERS IN 18 MONTHS FOMO cofounder @seyong says the goal is to become the default social graph for finance, with at least half of those users making their first-ever financial transaction on the platform. “in 18 months I'd love to be at 150 million users” Ft. @cryptomanran
- Sep 18, 20263.3x their median
🤯 WE ARE SO COOKED! AI just crossed a major intelligence threshold @EMostaque says a swarm of 10,000 AI agents solving Navier–Stokes changes the argument about what these systems can actually do. “do you really think there's anything you can do cognitively that this AI can't do” Ft. @alessandrorisk
- Sep 24, 20262.6x their median
🐂 THIS BULL RUN FINALLY FAVORS ALTCOINS @cryptomanran says ETH breaking a nine-year downtrend against Bitcoin may signal that tokenization is changing the structure of this cycle. “for the first time in nine years, we've actually broken out here” https://t.co/MIJHWX6Q9n
- Sep 18, 20262.6x their median
ALPHA 🔥: ON-CHAIN OPTIONS COULD BE CRYPTO’S NEXT BIG TRADE @cryptomanran says traditional finance relies heavily on options, and he expects crypto to need the same infrastructure on-chain. “if we're gonna migrate tradfi to our space, they're going to need options and they're going to need on chain options”
- Sep 18, 20262.5x their median
🔒 zcash:native IS BITCOIN WITH PRIVACY @cryptomanran said Zcash combines a Bitcoin-style proof-of-work design with decentralization, immutability, and private transactions. "The same ideology but only this time with privacy” https://t.co/kemuZshmzM
- Sep 16, 20262.4x their median
bitcoin:native COULD LOSE SUBSTANTIAL MARKET SHARE @themarketsniper says a major surge in smaller tokens could dramatically reduce Bitcoin’s relative share of the crypto market. “it's a big call, bullish call for alts... either it will be disappeared entirely or its overall scale to other tokens will be substantially reduced” Ft. @RiskTakers000 @alessandrorisk
- Oct 4, 20262.3x their median
HOT TAKE 🔥: FIAT KEEPS YOU WORKING TO REPLACE WHAT INFLATION TAKES. @MarkYusko recounts Jimmy Song’s argument that fiat earners remain dependent on a system that erodes their savings: “You're a slave to the fiat overlords who will then steal from you.” “Over a 30 year period, you lose half your purchasing power.” “If you save in Bitcoin, you unleash the most powerful force in humanity, which is human creativity.” Ft. @alessandrorisk
- Sep 23, 20262.1x their median
🚀 BITCOIN AS COLLATERAL COULD REPRICE $MSTR @dmweisberger says allowing Bitcoin deeper into the financial system as collateral could make MicroStrategy and similar companies much more valuable. “it's what will make Microstrategy and other companies be much more valuable” Ft. @BitcoinMagazine
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 120K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 439 times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.366% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49 interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.
- What is LeveragedInfo's engagement rate on X?
- LeveragedInfo (@LeveragedInfo) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 119,831 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.007%, LeveragedInfo sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LeveragedInfo have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LeveragedInfo post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.