Back to @Lepchas_'s profile

Lepchas engagement report

@Lepchas_ - 156K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.013%
of 156K followers
Per impression
1.74%
1.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 1.74% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.772% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tgif, #ufc331.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #tgif, #ufc331.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lepchas's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Lepchas sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video37% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link26% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 37% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 192 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 20264.4x their median

    we’re selling space on our clothes. and taking Web3 brands with us across 5 major crypto events in Mumbai. yes, we’re making our outfits part of the marketing. every event. every photo. every video. every conversation. your brand comes with us. 2 people. 1 campaign. 25 brands. we’re turning ourselves into walking billboards for Web3. and while everyone’s talking about Singapore right now, we’re betting on Mumbai. 🇮🇳 5 events. One packed Web3 week. 25 limited spots. your logo. on us. IRL. want your brand on the outfit? → https://t.co/SUgfPNe1Bu featuring: @IBWofficial · @SuperteamIN · @EFDevcon · @UnchainedSummit · @ETHGlobal which Web3 brand should claim a spot? 👀👇

    5792247.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.2x their median

    var mode on @variational_io has crossed $3B in daily trading volume. btw, at @HyperliquidX FDV & 25% airdrops, it will be huge ~$2200 / point. Hold your breath ! https://t.co/Wl3gaxbqVP

    372801.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.2x their median

    I’m super bullish on @variational_io & You ?

    3401211.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.0x their median

    var mode on https://t.co/MCSK2eIdgo

    37050927 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.8x their median

    These 18 traders have already become Millionaires from @variational_io Are you one of them ? Variational will be generational !! https://t.co/iZyFf7UhnL

    330501.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.8x their median

    Know the whales of @variational_io 1. @lynn000333 2. @linenmito 3. @onchainmonk 4. @CallumOnCrypto 5. @chivasxbt 6. @xkfai 7. @ElNachoCrypto Anyone else I’m missing?

    2511201.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.8x their median

    My X network is getting bigger, better, and highly valued. Thank you for being part of my journey. If you see yourself here, stop to say hello.. https://t.co/spqqvai8at

    29090888 viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.7x their median

    Wondering if to start trading on @TxFlow_L1 or not. Need perps expert opinion & TXFLOW ref (if recommended )

    2001602.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.7x their median

    One of the high-profile trader from our Lepchas traders gang is absolutely crushing the @Lighter_xyz × @RobinhoodApp trading campaign. 🔥 The volume is getting serious. 👀 Think you can beat his numbers? https://t.co/H4QiZ2eOpE

    28070767 viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.6x their median

    Var Mode On. Afer reading D,H,4H,M chart, drawing lines etc etc... When I place SHORT order, This has happen... This happens always :-) https://t.co/WrBX0VvI4b

    250811.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#tgif#ufc331

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 1.74% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.772% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tgif, #ufc331.

What is Lepchas's engagement rate on X?
Lepchas (@Lepchas_) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 156,010 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Lepchas sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Lepchas_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Lepchas_ post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going