Back to @LeonardJ_24's profile

LEO 🦁 engagement report

@LeonardJ_24 - 74K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 74K followers
Per impression
1.05%
2.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
23
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 686 interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LEO 🦁's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, LEO 🦁 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202630x their median

    on doxxing, the pros outweighs the cons imo if you haven't doxxed, you're such a lucky mf it's in your best interest that you keep it that way [gm]

    51681461631K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.5x their median

    ANOTHER FREE MINT WHITELIST ON ROBINHOOD✍️ might be something... don't fade (anyone can join) Submit your wallet for Genesis Artifacts application ⛽️ Mint Price - FREE ✅Apply for FREE Mint Whitelist - go to 👉https://t.co/qJVMzxfHGR - enter code: bunker - choose your class - drop your EVM wallet address ⚠️ends in 48 hrs... GL geng

    84810116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.2x their median

    DO THIS immediately you see this (anyone can join) ✍️Task - drop your wallet address for early bird ✅EARLY BIRD ON ROBO DISCORD idk anything yet but I dropped my wallet address - go to 👉https://t.co/6m6cZ8j8pU ⚠️this was how it started with The Saudi NFT and I ended up with 2ETH as profits but always DYOR

    721014112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.4x their median

    ANOTHER FREE MINT WHITELIST ON ROBINHOOD✍️ might be something... don't fade (anyone can join) Submit your wallet for Kid Hood Application ⛽️ Mint Price - FREE ✅Apply for FREE Mint Whitelist - go to 👉https://t.co/lAsfVwzgWb - drop your EVM wallet address ⚠️ might end soon... GL geng

    2852024.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20261.9x their median

    UPDATE ON JUMPER $JUMP AIRDROP 🪂 if your airdrop wallet was hacked... this is for you Jumper has set up a new wallet recovery form to transfer your eligible XP on your hacked wallet to a new wallet ✅Transfer XP to a new wallet: https://t.co/4eaOOhubxz good luck gengyyy https://t.co/nkJRu7XaV6

    335604.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.8x their median

    if you had invested $100 on the top tokens, yesterday This is what you will have now👇 $100 on $LAPTOP yesterday = $10,200 today $100 on $MAXI yesterday = $10,300 today $100 on $ZEC yesterday = $97 today $100 on $ZDOG yesterday = $16,800 today $100 on $SHROOM yesterday = $95 today $100 on 旺柴 yesterday = $430 today $100 on $SCRIB yesterday = $11,800 today

    266906.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    CT traders are now using AI to analyze and trade memecoins now? And nobody gave me this alpha? I tried @tryquantio, and this caught my attention. It can help with - FREE trading signals - and also trade meme and perps for me Check for yourself👇 🔗https://t.co/k5Ig5DiyxL ⚠️This is useful for active traders finding something worth buying QuantAI helps you to DYOR .. a good trading tool we all need

    252602.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    $50 - $500 airdrop on world earn $$ on your first trade reward ✅HOW TO GET THE AIRDROP - go to https://t.co/bGUrNa4nkM - signup with your gmail/wallet - click on earn to trade - connect 𝕏 - fund your wallet with at least $3 - make your first trade - you will get a FREE $$$ GL gengyyyy

    1921204.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026

    When was the last time you claimed a good airdrop

    1741102.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    the nft space is crazyyy. Tell me why niggas would list their NFT at $0.07 bro just keep it and take your L😭 I’d rather let shit rot in my wallet forever than sell it for 7 cents. https://t.co/pMF3KxwsIv

    211903.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 686 interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is LEO 🦁's engagement rate on X?
LEO 🦁 (@LeonardJ_24) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 74,148 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, LEO 🦁 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeonardJ_24 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LeonardJ_24 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going