Back to @LeonBenLarregui's profile

Leon Larregui engagement report

@LeonBenLarregui - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.029%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.403%
105K views on a typical post
Reach
7.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
425
interactions (median)
Saved
0.122%
128 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 425 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 0.403% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #neomexicanismos, #zoe, #zoé. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #neomexicanismos, #zoe, #zoé.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Leon Larregui sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 69 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202684x their median

    🚨🇲🇽 | LOS BISONTES ESTÁN SALVANDO EL NORTE DE MÉXICO Todo empezó en 2025, cuando 40 EJEMPLARES DE BISONTE AMERICANO llegaron a Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila, donde habían dejado de habitar desde hacía más de 200 AÑOS. Estos animales desaparecieron después de generaciones en las que distintas prácticas ganaderas redujeron los pastos que les servían de alimento y favorecieron la expansión de cactus y matorrales. Los bisontes son considerados INGENIEROS DEL ECOSISTEMA. Sus pisadas van ABLANDANDO LA TIERRA, lo que permite que el suelo absorba mejor el agua y favorece la regeneración de la vegetación. Además, al alimentarse van controlando el crecimiento del pasto: comen en ciertas zonas y dejan descansar otras, permitiendo que los PASTIZALES SE REGENEREN. En los últimos meses se ha reportado nuevamente la presencia de fauna como pumas, linces y pecaríes. Después de generaciones ausentes, los bisontes están ayudando a DEVOLVERLE VIDA AL NORTE DE MÉXICO.🙌

    30K5.3K1321381.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202684x their median

    Eclipse solar total sobre o Ártico. https://t.co/NWfJSJOXKe

    31K4.5K39140743K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202678x their median

    Lost in the moment. 🌅 https://t.co/0g9AOGLas3

    30K3.3K3438305K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202665x their median

    Master piece ! https://t.co/6XivYeF65i

    23K4.2K2495081.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202653x their median

    This is what grains of sand look like when magnified 100 to 300 times. 📸 Dr. Gary Greenberg https://t.co/Ml9hQZTFGJ

    19K2.7K3105194.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202640x their median

    #DATOHISTORICO UN RECORDATORIO DE LA GRANDEZA DE MEXICO ‼️ Antes de 1978, fabricar insulina significaba triturar toneladas de páncreas de cerdos y vacas en mataderos. Se necesitaba el páncreas de unos 50 animales para mantener viva a una sola persona diabética durante un año. Era carísima, escasa y provocaba reacciones alérgicas graves. En 1967, con solo 29 años, el científico mexicano Francisco Bolívar Zapata tuvo una idea que sonaba a ciencia ficción: meter la instrucción genética humana dentro de una bacteria y obligarla a fabricar insulina humana pura. El reto era enorme: una bacteria se defiende de cualquier ADN extraño. Bolívar diseñó un "vehículo" microscópico de transporte genético, un anillo de ADN llamado plásmido pBR322 (las letras "BR" son un homenaje directo a Bolívar), capaz de colarse sin activar sus defensas. Usaron la bacteria Escherichia coli como fábrica viviente. Le insertaron el gen humano de la insulina y la bacteria empezó a producir insulina 100% humana, de forma infinita y sin sacrificar un solo animal. Fue la primera vez en la historia que se fabricó una proteína humana mediante ingeniería genética: el momento exacto en que nació la biotecnología moderna. Hoy, cada persona que se inyecta insulina para vivir debe ese líquido transparente, gracias a un cientifico mexicano. #MexicoEsGrandeza #MexicoUnido

    12K4.7K152135191K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202631x their median

    The magic of fireflies https://t.co/METoV9nONK

    11K1.8K122122213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202627x their median

    Dragonflies fun facts - Just one dragonfly can consume over 100 mosquitos in a day - Dragonflies can fly backwards - They have nearly 360° vision - Their wings inhibit bacterial growth due to their natural structures - They're actually beautiful https://t.co/lEDZP8GK3m

    9.2K1.9K204127178K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202622x their median

    Hacer cine en México es un acto de valentía. Ver cine mexicano es un acto de resistencia. Proyectar cine mexicano es un acto de fe. Hablar, divulgar y escribir sobre cine mexicano es apoyar todas las batallas.

    7.8K1.5K113579K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202618x their median

    #ÚLTIMAHORA | Luces rojas en el cielo de San Luis Potosí sorprenden a usuarios de redes. Un maquinista captó varias luces suspendidas en el cielo mientras se encontraba en una estación. Hasta ahora no existe una explicación oficial sobre su origen. #SanLuisPotosí #Video #Viral https://t.co/IWX0hDTL0A

    6.3K1.2K21978581K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#neomexicanismos#zoe#zoé

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 425 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 0.403% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #neomexicanismos, #zoe, #zoé. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Leon Larregui's engagement rate on X?
Leon Larregui (@LeonBenLarregui) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,493,376 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Leon Larregui sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeonBenLarregui have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @LeonBenLarregui post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going