Back to @Leisatusexologa's profile

Leisa tu sexologa engagement report

@Leisatusexologa - 169K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.142%
of 169K followers
Per impression
1.38%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
10.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
241
interactions (median)
Saved
0.458%
80 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 241 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.142%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leisa tu sexologa's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.142%, Leisa tu sexologa sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 716 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 13, 2024156x their median

    Hablemos de BAJO DESEO FEMENINO Y CONDICIONAMIENTO PSICOLÓGICO Es muy común escuchar a hombres quejándose porque su pareja repele el contacto físico y es fácil concluir la razón Si cada vez que hay una caricia de él hacia ella es porque va tras un encuentro sexual, ella solamente relacionará la muestra afectiva con sexo y puesto que el deseo de ambos se da a destiempo, ella las primeras veces accederá sin ganas pero al cabo del tiempo terminará asociando el sexo a algo que no está haciendo por gusto sino por complacer Si bien es importante el juego erótico, la pareja ( especialmente el hombre), debe aprender que la afectividad tiene un canal por el que debe fluir permanentemente y que el abrazo, el beso o la caricia deben ser afectivos antes que sexuales Conclusión: Mimen más a su pareja con intención afectiva que la sexualidad fluirá espontáneamente ¿Te ha pasado? ¿Te hace sentido esto? Déjame tu comentario 👇🏼

    32K4.6K6535327.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202446x their median

    PORQUE ME LO PIDIERON: 3 PERFILES PSICOLÓGICOS DE LAS AMANTES. ¿Qué es lo que hay en la mente de esas mujeres que encaran una relación con un casado?  ¿Por qué aceptar ser la otra y tener una relación prohibida, oculta y estigmatizada por la sociedad?   Hilo 🧵 sin desperdicio. Lee y comparte.

    9.1K1.6K2591253.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202641x their median

    Alguien le dirá a Jennifer López que es regia, pero si canta no puede salir casi desnuda. Tanto le cuesta entender que ya no tiene 30 años y va camino a los 60. https://t.co/FR7xpDexcC

    5.3K2783.8K4551.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202639x their median

    Hay un lenguaje de contacto físico entre parejas, que es confuso: Para unas mujeres es un fastidio una palmada en la nalga Para otras (incluyéndome), es parte del contacto juguetón que sólo se tiene con una persona en el mundo, la pareja. Por qué resulta fastidioso? No lo extrañarías si faltase? Tú de que team eres?

    8.7K47917369977K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202636x their median

    Coming home to this after a long day? Pure bliss 🥹💙>>>>>>> https://t.co/6QJbGMlGAZ

    7.6K87120170861K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202628x their median

    Señores preocúpense por: - Ser exitosos no por tenerla grande 🍆 - No tener tantos hijos - No consumir drogas - Ellas los prefieren jóvenes (también) - Definitivamente no viva con su mamá. https://t.co/n3P95mtNzz

    6.2K280128261.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202627x their median

    Esto me hizo pensar en la ancestral y errónea idea de que las mujeres tienen menos deseo 😂. 🤡 Si yo pudiera publicar lo que las mujeres de todas las edades desean y lo abren en terapia, más de un marido y novio moriría de frustración e incapacidad. https://t.co/vOYBR2HafM

    5.6K62628565376K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202615x their median

    ¿Por qué es problemático normalizar el rechazo a la pareja? Esto no es para hacer señalamientos, victimización ni buscar culpables, ese es el primer error que cometen las parejas cuando dejan de tener sexo, pelearse entre ellos en lugar de buscar el origen del problema. La negativa reiterada de sexualidad va a generar algo que se llama circuito de demanda/retirada Esto quiere decir que uno de los dos pide y pide y él que no quiere sexo, evita y evade y esto se vuelve una situación perpetua sin fin. La pérdida de deseo es multifactorial, no siempre es hormonal y no siempre es porque se tenga moz@. 🤦🏻‍♀️ Lo importante es no normalizarlo, verlo como una señal enorme de qué algo está pasando y es preciso resolverlo, y acudir a un profesional cin formación académica que pueda ayudarles a entender el problema. Entonces, no es válido ni el rechazo sostenido ni ir a buscar amante porque ninguna de las dos resuelve sino que al contrario empeora el problema. En el video que me compartieron es ella quien se niega, pero esto pasa igualmente con hombres que pierden su deseo Si necesitan orientación y solución por este problema, los profesionales de la Psicologia de pareja y sexología Clínica tenemos la formación académica para ayudarles.

    3.3K242496415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.6x their median

    Ejercer la prostitución (presencial o virtual), siempre va a dejar marcas psicológicas. No es un ejercicio inofensivo Me han preguntado que opino de ese oficio, y personalmente respeto la decisión de las adultas que eligen ese camino. Pero las he atendido en consulta y generalmente terminan teniendo conflictos emocionales relacionados a la tristeza, la duda y la culpa.

    1.5K21788894K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20266.3x their median

    El amor de este par es ejemplarizante😍 *Nunca se ven envueltos en escándalos *Nunca se les ha visto coqueteando con terceras personas con todo y que viven en un medio que se presta *Él manifiesta públicamente que no hay otra mujer que robe su atención más que su esposa. *Ella le toma fotos sexies que evidencian cuanto lo desea Sus miradas lo dicen todo Hay esperanza aún en el amor bueno Hermosa relación de Javier Bardem y Penélope cruz❤️❤️❤️

    1.4K87191375K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 241 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.142%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

What is Leisa tu sexologa's engagement rate on X?
Leisa tu sexologa (@Leisatusexologa) has an engagement rate of 0.142%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,408 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.142%, Leisa tu sexologa sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Leisatusexologa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Leisatusexologa post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going