Back to @Legend_ElBashir's profile

π‹π„π†π„ππƒπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ engagement report

@Legend_ElBashir - 82K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.109%
of 82K followers
Per impression
1.29%
6.9K views on a typical post
Reach
8.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
90
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 355K interactions, about 3950x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #30jourspourlejusteprix, #discipline, #mbappΓ©ballondor2026.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #30jourspourlejusteprix, #discipline, #mbappΓ©ballondor2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

π‹π„π†π„ππƒπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.109%, π‹π„π†π„ππƒπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 25, 20173950x their median

    Not bad 11 πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/Ww0rCnU3Cv

    287K61K2.8K5.1KView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026548x their median

    The midfield The attack https://t.co/8WyGEQU5hD

    47K1.6K5415485.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202686x their median

    Aleksandar PavloviΔ‡ rejected an inquiry from Manchester City, who were willing to bid up to €100m for him. An initial inquiry from City had already taken place in March. The German international was City's preferred target for the position, with coach Enzo Maresca actively involved. PavloviΔ‡ feels comfortable at Bayern, wants to win the Champions League with the team and rejected City's approach. Therefore, an official offer from City to Bayern never arrived, even though Bayern were informed of the interest. Man City ended up signing Bouaddi instead [@AgardiJulian, @cfbayern]

    6.9K375144256504K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202662x their median

    πŸ₯ ZdjΔ™cia z badaΕ„ medycznych Gabriela Jesusa w barwach FC Barcelony. πŸ“Έ @fcbarcelona https://t.co/m63wc4ZWFW

    4.8K1331075894.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202661x their median

    πŸ†•πŸƒπŸ» https://t.co/RJaXujoeN7

    5.3K2211715147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202636x their median

    This year's Ballon d'Or race will be GENERATIONAL! πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ https://t.co/pOPW1md54x

    2.9K8620674384K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202625x their median

    Sama papa 500f lay bindΓ© domicile #30JoursPourLeJustePrix

    1.8K2488795131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202618x their median

    Tay croisement Saly benn faux cokseur mo dougou si auto bi encaissΓ© passe yeup ngen dem yonamπŸ˜‚lii mom galadj la.

    1.4K125331037K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20269.5x their median

    Y’a un ami qui vient de me signaler qu’on a souvent tendance Γ  oublier Kimmich alors qu’il fait partie des tous meilleurs joueurs au monde Γ  son poste. Mais c’est Γ§a l’inconvΓ©nient de jouer pour un club sans aura ni buzz comme le Bayern Munich https://t.co/g1jj6HyhGc

    7705222815K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20268.5x their median

    Mais Jackson il va où comme ça 😭 https://t.co/C9Ns2o4zxt

    46210165124238K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#30jourspourlejusteprix#discipline#mbappΓ©ballondor2026#reels#route

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 355K interactions, about 3950x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #30jourspourlejusteprix, #discipline, #mbappΓ©ballondor2026.

What is π‹π„π†π„ππƒπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ's engagement rate on X?
π‹π„π†π„ππƒπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ (@Legend_ElBashir) has an engagement rate of 0.109%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 81,772 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.109%, π‹π„π†π„ππƒπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Legend_ElBashir have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Legend_ElBashir post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going