Legal Times engagement report
@Legal_Times - 78K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 240 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.309% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3 interactions.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Legal Times's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, Legal Times sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,335 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.67% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 289 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 2026
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court said construction may continue on President Donald Trump's White House ballroom project. https://t.co/3Ss5mJ0noN
- Oct 8, 2026
The New York-based firm uses a subscription model to charge clients for access to its STAAR artificial intelligence advisory platform, but it… www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/debevoise-to-shift-ai-platform-costs-as-big-law-pursues-pricing-model-beyond-billable-hour/ https://t.co/tKZ95a7wB8
- Sep 4, 2026
Jason Isbell and other musicians are testing a new legal front against AI music generator Suno, arguing that the company misused artists' identities and voiceprints, not just copyrighted songs, to create soundalike music, descriptions and artwork. https://t.co/wU89rwlS6C
- Sep 1, 2026
The antitrust lateral surge highlighted a busy week in D.C., where at least 11 Big Law firms have added lateral partners since Monday. https://t.co/5nEGaFAf56
- Oct 13, 2026
The justices will review a lower court's decision subjecting the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency Service to extensive document production and a… www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/13/supreme-court-will-hear-governments-bid-to-shield-doge-from-discovery/ https://t.co/I3GA2dTrI1
- Oct 12, 2026
Sidley first arrived in San Diego in August 2024 and will take over a larger footprint by 2028. www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/12/sidley-austin-outgrows-san-diego-office-2-years-after-arrival-/ https://t.co/YWcvSEQVwz
- Oct 9, 2026
The U.S. Justice Department has been investing in data analytics for years but in recent months has signaled it is increasing these efforts through the division's… www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/09/doj-doubles-down-on-data-analytics-compliance-programs-must-keep-pace/ https://t.co/KFJNzdGiUJ
- Oct 8, 2026
Represented by former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and other attorneys from his firm, Torridon Law, the NFL argued that states are better-equipped… www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/nfl-urges-us-supreme-court-to-take-up-case-over-regulation-of-prediction-markets-/ https://t.co/KYnro9kS8U
- Oct 8, 2026
The latest new hires also include counsel, associates and public policy principals. www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/brown-rudnick-greenberg-foley--lardner-omelveny-add-dc-partners/ https://t.co/VHuYtgoUYR
- Oct 8, 2026
The competing trends have exposed a potential contradiction of the SEC's agenda: easing the regulatory burdens of being public while simultaneously… www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/sec-push-to-revive-ipos-collides-with-exchanges-stricter-listing-rules-lawyers-say/ https://t.co/S0mtnHArs3
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 240 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.309% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3 interactions.
- What is Legal Times's engagement rate on X?
- Legal Times (@Legal_Times) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 77,785 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, Legal Times sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,335 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Legal_Times have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Legal_Times post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.