Back to @Legal_Times's profile

Legal Times engagement report

@Legal_Times - 78K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 78K followers
Per impression
0%
240 views on a typical post
Reach
0.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 240 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.309% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3 interactions.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Legal Times's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Legal Times sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,335 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,335 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,892 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 289 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026

    In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court said construction may continue on President Donald Trump's White House ballroom project. https://t.co/3Ss5mJ0noN

    2010696 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    The New York-based firm uses a subscription model to charge clients for access to its STAAR artificial intelligence advisory platform, but it… www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/debevoise-to-shift-ai-platform-costs-as-big-law-pursues-pricing-model-beyond-billable-hour/ https://t.co/tKZ95a7wB8

    1010212 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Jason Isbell and other musicians are testing a new legal front against AI music generator Suno, arguing that the company misused artists' identities and voiceprints, not just copyrighted songs, to create soundalike music, descriptions and artwork. https://t.co/wU89rwlS6C

    1010535 viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    The antitrust lateral surge highlighted a busy week in D.C., where at least 11 Big Law firms have added lateral partners since Monday. https://t.co/5nEGaFAf56

    2000768 viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    The justices will review a lower court's decision subjecting the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency Service to extensive document production and a… www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/13/supreme-court-will-hear-governments-bid-to-shield-doge-from-discovery/ https://t.co/I3GA2dTrI1

    1000236 viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    Sidley first arrived in San Diego in August 2024 and will take over a larger footprint by 2028. www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/12/sidley-austin-outgrows-san-diego-office-2-years-after-arrival-/ https://t.co/YWcvSEQVwz

    1000313 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    The U.​S. Justice Department has been investing in data analytics for years but in recent months has signaled it is increasing these efforts through the division's… www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/09/doj-doubles-down-on-data-analytics-compliance-programs-must-keep-pace/ https://t.co/KFJNzdGiUJ

    1000186 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    Represented by former U.​S. Attorney General Bill Barr and other attorneys from his firm, Torridon Law, the NFL argued that states are better-equipped… www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/nfl-urges-us-supreme-court-to-take-up-case-over-regulation-of-prediction-markets-/ https://t.co/KYnro9kS8U

    1000379 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    The latest new hires also include counsel, associates and public policy principals. www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/brown-rudnick-greenberg-foley--lardner-omelveny-add-dc-partners/ https://t.co/VHuYtgoUYR

    0100241 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    The competing trends have exposed a potential contradiction of the SEC's agenda: easing the regulatory burdens of being public while simultaneously… www.​law.​com/nationallawjournal/2026/10/08/sec-push-to-revive-ipos-collides-with-exchanges-stricter-listing-rules-lawyers-say/ https://t.co/S0mtnHArs3

    1000150 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 240 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.309% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3 interactions.

What is Legal Times's engagement rate on X?
Legal Times (@Legal_Times) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 77,785 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Legal Times sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,335 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Legal_Times have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Legal_Times post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going