Back to @Leg453's profile

Leg_45 engagement report

@Leg453 - 82K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.188%
of 82K followers
Per impression
3.97%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
4.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
155
interactions (median)
Saved
0.474%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 155 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.188%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 3.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leg_45's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.188%, Leg_45 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 31, 202233x their median

    Weaknesses: Emma Watson, Victoria Justice, Taylor Swift, Chloe Grace Moretz, Selena Gomez, Bella Thorne, Ariana Grande, Kendall Jenner, Millie Bobby Brown, Ariel Winter, Jordyn Jones, Karen Gillan, Kate Beckinsale, Maddie Ziegler, Blake Lively, Emily Feld https://t.co/oupcACeMri

    4.6K4121908View on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.7x their median

    I wonder if Caitlin Clark knew how triggering this would be for leg guys. https://t.co/1WZuHC93DI

    8086117017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.2x their median

    Pictures like these prove Aubrey Plaza knows her legs are hot https://t.co/b36YN1IkUy

    46529317.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.3x their median

    Emily Feld, just as hot indoors as out. https://t.co/G57E1PfZdB

    33226206.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.3x their median

    Presley Elise heating up her local supermarket https://t.co/hGeZDP3O5e

    32126118.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.0x their median

    Victoria Justice flaunts a flawless leg https://t.co/Y1ApS5sSRg

    29115204.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.9x their median

    Emma Watson displaying all of her beauty https://t.co/Z9VsqPxDMD

    28116204.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.8x their median

    Mckenna Grace's crossed legs looking sexy https://t.co/9NMjgAPgXo

    27113005.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.8x their median

    When you have a beach body like Emily Feld it would be a crime not to show it off https://t.co/RA1joi32yu

    25714205.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.7x their median

    Olivia Rodrigo knowing her legs are incredible https://t.co/1r8cIhKB95

    24118104.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 155 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.188%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 3.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is Leg_45's engagement rate on X?
Leg_45 (@Leg453) has an engagement rate of 0.188%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 82,236 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.188%, Leg_45 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Leg453 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Leg453 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going