Back to @LeeStrobel's profile

Lee Strobel engagement report

@LeeStrobel - 350K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 350K followers
Per impression
0.967%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
2.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
100
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.967% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncos, #followfriday, #kindledeals.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #broncos, #followfriday, #kindledeals.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lee Strobel's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Lee Strobel sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 122 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 2026127x their median

    The surgeon took one look at the x-ray of my right hip and said it was one of the worst cases of osteoarthritis he had ever seen. No wonder I've been in pain for so long. Hip replacement surgery is Tuesday. Would you please pray for me?

    11K4511.1K41107K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202681x their median

    Prayers answered! My surgery went flawlessly. I'm already home! Still some pain & a lot of protocols I need to follow, but the recovery is off to a great start. Thanks for being the best of X!

    7.7K167267950K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202639x their median

    THANK YOU to the many people who agreed to pray for my surgery tomorrow morning! As we Texans say, "Ah 'preciate ya!"

    3.7K104126734K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.8x their median

    My good friend @GregStierSpeaks was locked out of his old X account and had to start over. Greg is a great Christian leader and evangelist --please follow him and repost to help him rebuild!

    2203719112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    https://t.co/I9vbMCFsJp

    194152212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    My buddy Mark Mittelberg speaking in Tampa on how Christians can share their faith in a way that syncs up with their own style. https://t.co/f6FA4Tm5wW

    9794010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    https://t.co/0nuPU1aMSC

    8315205.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    https://t.co/9FOWggWHKY

    8018206.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Ideal for Christians looking for a reliable resource to aid them in understanding apologetics – or to give to their spiritually curious friends: the NIV Case for Christ New Testament with Psalms and Proverbs. It's an engaging resource that motivates seekers & skeptics to investigate for themselves the Bible’s most compelling claims. Order a few copies for yourself and some to share : https://t.co/7fScHdFXG9

    7012408.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    https://t.co/SJXgwI2X5y

    438306.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#broncos#followfriday#kindledeals

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.967% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncos, #followfriday, #kindledeals.

What is Lee Strobel's engagement rate on X?
Lee Strobel (@LeeStrobel) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 350,187 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Lee Strobel sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeeStrobel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LeeStrobel post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going