Back to @LeeStrobel's profile

Lee Strobel engagement report

@LeeStrobel - 350K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 350K followers
Per impression
1.05%
9.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
94
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 135x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lee Strobel's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Lee Strobel sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link54% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 54% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 529 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 2026135x their median

    The surgeon took one look at the x-ray of my right hip and said it was one of the worst cases of osteoarthritis he had ever seen. No wonder I've been in pain for so long. Hip replacement surgery is Tuesday. Would you please pray for me?

    11K4521.1K41108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202695x their median

    Prayers answered! My surgery went flawlessly. I'm already home! Still some pain & a lot of protocols I need to follow, but the recovery is off to a great start. Thanks for being the best of X!

    8.4K191291959K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202642x their median

    THANK YOU to the many people who agreed to pray for my surgery tomorrow morning! As we Texans say, "Ah 'preciate ya!"

    3.7K105127735K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202619x their median

    This book was a lifetime in the making—and then it became something I never planned. I spent years researching a science-apologetics book. It was my entire life. But when it came time to write, I just didn’t have the heart for it. Years of trials had left me feeling dry and weary. I didn’t want to argue about God. Instead, I wanted to sit with Him. Every time I looked at incredible images of the heavens, I felt renewed. I felt close to Him. I thought about what the heavens were declaring about Him. So I asked a different question: What do the heavens actually tell us about His nature, His character, and His love? I started off writing a simple devotional, but it turned into something more: equal parts Bible study, personal reflection, and astronomy lesson—with a little history stitched in—along with over 100 stunning images of God’s handiwork in the cosmos. I love it, and I think you'll love it, too. The Heavens Declare is out November 3 from Moody Publishers, with a foreword by Lee Strobel. Pre-order my book if you want to explore God's universe with me. https://t.co/0rF4wspvfl

    1.4K1931172470K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202615x their median

    Poor Leslie! It's her birthday but she's stuck helping me recover from surgery! Best. Wife. Ever.

    1.3K3275113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202615x their median

    Kirk Cousins has never won a Super Bowl. He has never been named MVP. He has exactly one playoff win in 14 seasons. He has also earned more money playing football than Tom Brady. Cousins is past $341 million in career earnings, ahead of Brady's $333 million, and he did it in about half the seasons. Roughly $339 million of that was fully guaranteed, which is an NFL record. He has now played 11 consecutive seasons on a fully guaranteed contract, something almost nobody in league history has managed even once. He is, by a wide margin, the best businessman who ever played quarterback. And for years, he drove a dented van he bought off his grandmother for five thousand dollars. A 2000 GMC Savana conversion van. More than 100,000 miles. Leather seats and built-in TV screens from an era when that was a selling point. Here's the part people skip when they tell this as a joke about a cheap millionaire. He bought it after his grandfather died. His grandparents had owned that van for years, and when Cousins was a kid in Michigan, they'd load the family in and drive to Iowa Hawkeye games. There's still a Hawkeye logo on the tow hitch. When his 86-year-old grandfather passed away in the 2014 offseason, Cousins bought the van from his grandmother. He already had two cars. He didn't need a third. His wife Julie told him not to do it. "We'd hop in and say this is a great car," Cousins said. "It had leather seats, all the bells and whistles." It was supposed to sit in the driveway for when family visited. Then the lease ran out on his Chevy Tahoe and he never got around to replacing it, so the van became his daily driver. He drove it to practice. He drove it to the stadium on game days as the starting quarterback of an NFL team. "I've been a little lazy and haven't gotten another car to go from A to B to work. So the van has kinda had to fill that role for now." His running back in Washington, Alfred Morris, rode a bicycle to work, so Cousins figured he had cover. "Sometimes our swagger is having no swagger. Let's win football games and then a conversion van will start to be cool." In 2018 he signed a three-year, $84 million fully guaranteed deal with Minnesota, making him the second-highest paid player in the league. He was still driving the van. He posted a picture of it himself that summer. "People like to give me a hard time, but it still runs well." The van was only part of it. For years he and Julie spent chunks of the offseason living in the basement of his parents' house in Holland, Michigan, then her parents' basement in Georgia when it got cold, while he was earning north of $20 million a year. His whole philosophy fits in one sentence. "It's better to buy appreciating assets than depreciating. No yachts, no sports cars." He's 38 now, on his fourth team, and nothing has really changed. This week Cousins volunteered to reporters that he has an In-N-Out addiction. On an off day in August he ordered himself a 3x3, three patties and three slices of cheese, by himself, for no occasion. "I can put down a lot of In-N-Out burgers." A man who has out-earned Tom Brady, whose signature indulgence costs about six dollars. Most of this story gets told as a punchline. Rich quarterback, ugly van, funny guy. The real reason he kept it is that his grandpa used to drive it to football games.

    1.2K1257324232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20265.4x their median

    BIG. ANNOUNCEMENT. COMING. THIS. WEEK. Not a new book or movie. Something incredible for FREE for every church and ministry. Stay tuned!

    4712111011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.0x their median

    My good friend @GregStierSpeaks was locked out of his old X account and had to start over. Greg is a great Christian leader and evangelist --please follow him and repost to help him rebuild!

    2213819112K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.4x their median

    MIZZOU!

    21628111K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.3x their median

    ANNOUNCING – Mark Mittelberg and I will be moderating The Great Debate 2027: Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead? – an intellectual shoot-out between America’s #1 skeptic (Dr. Michael Shermer) and one of the world’s top Christian thinkers (Dr. William Lane Craig). Live from First Baptist Dallas on Sunday evening, March 7. And get this: Apologetics Inc. raised funds so that any church, campus ministry, student ministry, or other organization can host their own outreach event and show the debate LIVE and FOR FREE. Yes, an epic, no-cost turn-key event where you can invite your spiritually curious friends and neighbors to hear this pivotal doctrine of Christianity presented and debated. Tell your pastor or ministry leader! Go to https://t.co/kdp1gLCLWU for more information and to register.

    17536709.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 350K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 135x its own typical post.

What is Lee Strobel's engagement rate on X?
Lee Strobel (@LeeStrobel) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 350,354 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Lee Strobel sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeeStrobel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LeeStrobel post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going