PlayerSells
Back to @LeeMZeldin's profile

Lee Zeldin engagement report

@LeeMZeldin - 904K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.152%
of 904K followers
Per impression
5.28%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
2.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 904K followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 5.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lee Zeldin's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.152%, Lee Zeldin sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,660 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.048% to 0.328%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.048%
p750.328%
p902.48%
p99343.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,660 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 429,653 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.048%
75th percentile0.328%
90th percentile2.48%
99th percentile343.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link22% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+13%+10% to +15%6.4K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 331 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 22, 202654x their median

    Tomorrow, the House will vote on the NDAA, which includes a provision to merge parts of our military with the IDF. This amendment is an existential threat to American sovereignty and democracy. Every member of Congress must vote NO.

    59K10K4.7K9933.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202621x their median

    Requiring photo ID in all 50 states, and proof of U.S. citizenship, is such a no-brainer that should have been implemented a very long time ago!

    26K3.1K66057713K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202615x their median

    In ALL 50 states, PHOTO ID should be MANDATORY to vote!

    18K2.1K54353134K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202613x their median

    Yesterday, I had a detailed call with Canada’s Ambassador to the U.S., @MarkDWiseman. I stressed to him, on behalf of millions of concerned Americans, just how extremely important and urgent it is to put out all the fires harming U.S. air quality. Going forward, it will be so vital to maximize proactive forest management, early fire detection, and resource staging and instant mobilization. These cross-border air events simply cannot keep happening every year.   For the most up to date and timely information, visit EPA’s air monitoring website at: https://t.co/fFo9hJ6Z5Q

    13K2.3K2.5K166437K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202613x their median

    "This is one of the most talented teams ever to serve the United States and in the United States government... America is safer and stronger and far more successful than it was two years ago." - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸 https://t.co/bR1QMKCLEd

    13K2.7K1.6K121256K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.5x their median

    Busy day at the White House! Today’s press briefing will take place at 11AM ET. At 2:30PM, President Trump will travel to @EPA for an event on his “Ratepayer Protection Pledge” — a key initiative to ensure AI companies are picking up the electricity tab in local communities where they are building AI data centers. And then the President will host the LA Dodgers at 4:30PM in the Rose Garden!

    4.8K87247334190K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.0x their median

    Kathy Hochul and Albany bureaucrats are jamming upstate New York communities with the installation of solar farms all over precious land. Impacted New Yorkers are very rationally demanding local control instead of Hochul control. https://t.co/Q0iRmDpRnJ

    3.1K8691132368K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.9x their median

    There are very good reasons it’s called TEMPORARY Protected Status and not PERMANENT Protected Status.

    3.7K31656631K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.9x their median

    1 PERSON 1 VOTE is a fundamental constitutional principle and right reserved for U.S. citizens ONLY. There must be ZERO tolerance for even a single U.S. citizen’s vote to be diluted AT ALL by others illegally in our country.

    3.3K5911001233K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.5x their median

    The Trump EPA answered the call from millions of Americans and ENDED the absurd Climate Participation Trophy, created by the Obama Admin, to reward manufacturers for installing the almost universally despised START/STOP feature in vehicles that causes it to die at all red lights and stop signs. Discussed with @TudorDixon how the Trump EPA wants manufacturers to build the vehicles consumers prefer to buy rather than the vehicles that DC bureaucrats and politicians demand.

    2.7K547108631K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 904K followers, an engagement rate of 0.152%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 5.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is Lee Zeldin's engagement rate on X?
Lee Zeldin (@LeeMZeldin) has an engagement rate of 0.152%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 904,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.152%, Lee Zeldin sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,660 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeeMZeldin have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LeeMZeldin post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going