Lee Harris engagement report
@LeeHarris - 183K followers on X
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.3K interactions against 183K followers, an engagement rate of 2.36%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 16.9% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 24% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lee Harris's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 2.36%, Lee Harris sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 20268.8x their median
Dear UK Police, You have new powers to arrest anyone wearing a face covering at a protest. OK. But know this. We are going to be at EVERY SINGLE far-left antifa protest to see if you apply the same rules to them. Let's see what happens. You will be filmed. https://t.co/SoznwSL4wo
- Sep 13, 20265.8x their median
I honestly can't believe Alexis Boon, Chief Constable of Hampshire police, is still at work as if nothing has happened. His police force tried to smear Henry Nowak as aggressor THREE DAYS after his murder. They tried to cover it up and influence the trial. We will not forget. https://t.co/ONQZgVeW2q
- Sep 14, 20265.6x their median
This is INSANE! GB News attempted to interview the charity workers assisting in the invasion of Britain and they came under attack from illegal migrants. THESE ARE THE VILE PEOPLE LABOUR ARE PUTTING IN OUR COMMUNITIES! People need to WAKE UP! https://t.co/2kJnfaS3no
- Sep 12, 20263.9x their median
This is INSANE. Hampshire police have *deliberately* marched in far-left protestors so they are literally 30 feet apart. I've seen Avon and Somerset police use this same tactic. Looks like the police are trying to get it to kick off. Utterly unacceptable! https://t.co/BzUO0k1AcM
- Sep 11, 20263.5x their median
Antifa have been allowed to wear masks for YEARS, specifically so they can be violent. The moment peaceful patriots do the same, just to protect their identity from deranged leftists, they call it "intimidating" and police get new powers. Two-tier. https://t.co/T9C9JNTmPd
- Oct 10, 20263.4x their median
I repeat. We *do not* have a problem with the so-called "far right" in the UK. We do, however, have a serious problem with a highly organised, well funded, well connected, Palestine obsessed, violent, unhinged, Britain-hating far-left. https://t.co/APKYuXQrHa
- Sep 16, 20262.9x their median
When John Healey was Defence Secretary, he didn't know how many frigates we had. Now as Chancellor, he didn't realise how bad the public finances are. John Healey shouldn't be anywhere near a position of power. The man is a colossal idiot. https://t.co/F8HCaDDKor
- Oct 14, 20262.3x their median
This is superb from @SuellaBraverman. She tears SHREDS out of the govts dangerous decision to ignore safety concerns and house illegal migrants in Piddington. She rightly calls out the fact there are NO female Labour MPs taking part in this debate. She does NOT hold back! 🔥 https://t.co/4yUqM5XKr9
- Sep 12, 20262.2x their median
This is brilliant. @markwhiteTV explains it was a peaceful protest in Portsmouth, but there were a couple of arrests for minor infringements. "One gentleman was arrested for wearing a makeshift Burka. I'm not sure of the charge..." He can't hold back the laughter. Haha 😂 https://t.co/EKowAJmMTI
- Oct 13, 20262.0x their median
Well, that didn't take long. Keir Starmer misled parliament multiple times and here is Andy Burnham doing *exactly* the same thing. It's outrageous that Labour are consistently allowed to get away with this. He's a liar and he should correct the record. https://t.co/4CuN3v6Xbe
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.3K interactions against 183K followers, an engagement rate of 2.36%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 16.9% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 24% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.
- What is Lee Harris's engagement rate on X?
- Lee Harris (@LeeHarris) has an engagement rate of 2.36%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 182,694 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 2.36%, Lee Harris sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LeeHarris have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LeeHarris post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.