Back to @LayahHeilpern's profile

Layah Heilpern engagement report

@LayahHeilpern - 690K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.063%
of 690K followers
Per impression
1.14%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
5.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
433
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 433 interactions against 690K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 99x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Layah Heilpern's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.063%, Layah Heilpern sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 28, 202299x their median

    If #bitcoin became the world's reserve currency and hit $1 million, Peter would still be screaming it's a ponzi... I think it's fair to stay I won this round. @PeterSchiff I'm inviting you for a rematch on my podcasts, whatdya say? 😁 https://t.co/2cxVdpimkc

    31K5.5K5.5K714View on X
  • Aug 3, 202626x their median

    Strategy increased its USD Reserve by $250M and repurchased $81M of $STRC. This increased USD Duration by 57 days to 2.3 years and tightened STRC’s BTC Credit by 5 bps. As of 8/2/26, we hold ₿842,138 in our BTC Reserve and $4.0B in our USD Reserve. $MSTR https://t.co/t7bGZJ8Q3o

    8.5K9091.2K5162.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.5x their median

    My thoughts on current crypto pump https://t.co/fsIE1z5zbL

    1.5K79665105791K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.6x their median

    Good morning team Be careful chasing pumps! https://t.co/SeNAAiPA4d

    9404755031276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.0x their median

    Bitcoin hits $68,000! Here's where everyone starts to FOMO in. Don't get emotional, stay calm. Stick to the plan.

    95046300791K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.9x their median

    Damn today has been wild, when the market dumps yall gonna owe me an apology 😂

    6712354131209K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.7x their median

    Gm from Monaco 🇲🇨 The DCA starts soon, time to change your life. Get ready the bottom is close! https://t.co/8zGc4Yl4qE

    95725174671K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.6x their median

    So Strategy sold another $108.6 million of Bitcoin… Michael should have sold the top in Q4 like I did! https://t.co/46kazR7kjU

    92538168292K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.6x their median

    Seriously though in the grand scheme of crypto, crypto really doesn’t need the clarity act. We made it to $120,000 without it. And we will make it to 500k without it too!

    9784391437K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.5x their median

    My God, someone explained to me how I just spent the last 10 days eating ridiculous amounts of bread, dessert, cake and no gym just steps in Europe And I’ve just LOST weight? What is in the food in Europe compared to the US?! 😂

    85830185399K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 433 interactions against 690K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 99x its own typical post.

What is Layah Heilpern's engagement rate on X?
Layah Heilpern (@LayahHeilpern) has an engagement rate of 0.063%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 689,586 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.063%, Layah Heilpern sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LayahHeilpern have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LayahHeilpern post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going