Lawrence O'Donnell engagement report
@Lawrence - 2.9M followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.519% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.546% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 1048x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #lastword.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lawrence O'Donnell's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Lawrence O'Donnell sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Nov 2, 20181048x their median
Trump: “When I can, I tell the truth.” That’s a lie. @TheLastWord 10pm
- Aug 19, 2026481x their median
She “declined?” “Declined”? You can’t just decline to get a security clearance. You either get one or you don’t have a job. So much dysfunction in this White House. When will the GOP have had enough? Why risk the country for this? https://t.co/X0unu3P0FX
- Jul 30, 2026269x their median
The State Department said it takes "full responsibility" for "hastily" altering and then presenting a map of Africa at a global AIDS conference that mislabeled every single country it highlighted. An analysis by Reuters found a watermark in the map image that suggests it was made with OpenAI.
- Aug 9, 2026155x their median
Senate Republicans ignore the Epstein survivors and confirm Todd Blanche. House Republicans ignore Bernie and Emily Moreno and do nothing about Max Miller. Zuckerberg's yacht ignores people in distress. It's Donald Trump's party.
- Jul 30, 2026143x their median
If you want to know what’s wrong with Washington, take a look at the Rand Paul/Dr. Fauci hearing. Pointing fingers and assigning blame rather than learning lessons to prevent the next pandemic. Where are the hearings on the measles outbreak? How about hearings on the cyclosporiasis outbreak? If that’s not enough to get you sick, this administration continues to leave Americans more vulnerable than ever to disease as they continue to dismantle the FDA and the CDC.
- Aug 18, 2026129x their median
Trump promised to balance the budget. Musk projected $2 trillion in savings. This year, the deficit grew by 18% — with $200 billion of that due to refunds of his illegal tariffs. My @nytopinion Chart https://t.co/aSuK1r67VU
- Aug 19, 202692x their median
The Rot at the Heart of Trump's Treasury: A Regime So Corrupt Even Its Own Loyalists Are Fleeing Before the Handcuffs Arrive In Trump's second term, senior Treasury officials are quitting in droves rather than risk prison. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already suffered a "dramatic exodus." At least four of the seven top officials left after clashing with the White House over demands to stretch — or violate — tax law. Seven of 16 Senate-confirmed appointees (44 percent) have quit or been pushed out. Bessent has burned through at least three chiefs of staff. The flashpoints were explicit. Officials resisted pressure to hand over taxpayer data for the administration's immigration crackdown. They also rejected a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund designed to compensate Trump allies and kill any past or future IRS audits of the president and his family. Senate Republicans forced the fund's abandonment, but the demand itself exposed the agenda. These career professionals are not fleeing out of sudden conscience alone. They fully intend to work again once this criminal regime's reign of terror and corruption ends. They know that complying with illegal orders now could mean disbarment, indictment, or permanent exile from government and private-sector work later. Mark Mazur, a veteran tax official who served both parties, stated the obvious: "They're asking them to do stuff that is well beyond the norm, and for some things that may or may not be legal. A lot of these people expect to have a career after this administration, and being disbarred would be a bad thing for them." This turnover exceeds that under any other treasury secretary this century. Even Republican tax professionals are refusing to comply. The pattern is clear: the White House is treating tax law as optional when it protects one man. Officials who still value their freedom, licenses, and future livelihoods are walking away while they still can.
- Jul 30, 202661x their median
DOJ’s seven-figure payout to convicted abortion clinic blocker shows slush fund is very much alive. My thoughts in @opinion.bloomberg.com. Gift link: https://t.co/FSnbQXzuib
- Jul 31, 202656x their median
“Another way of saying it is simply that we’re replacing the free market with the market for Trump’s affections.” Must read scoop from the WSJ: https://t.co/LyWHPMQxC1 https://t.co/hfNv80Ddhv
- Aug 14, 202654x their median
I am aware of exactly zero countries in the world that routinely split MMR into three separate measles, mumps, and rubella shots Zero
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.519% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.546% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 1048x its own typical post.
- What is Lawrence O'Donnell's engagement rate on X?
- Lawrence O'Donnell (@Lawrence) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,858,759 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Lawrence O'Donnell sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Lawrence have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Lawrence post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.93 posts per day across the measured window.