Back to @Lawrence's profile

Lawrence O'Donnell engagement report

@Lawrence - 2.9M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 2.9M followers
Per impression
0.825%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
1.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
298
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.57/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.825% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 285x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #lastword.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lawrence O'Donnell's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Lawrence O'Donnell sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 146 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 2, 2018285x their median

    Trump: “When I can, I tell the truth.” That’s a lie. @TheLastWord 10pm

    56K15K12K1.6KView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026202x their median

    Mamdani is doing something that Rudy Giuliani refused to do. He’s releasing all the documents showing officials knew the air in NYC was full of asbestos and other toxins after 9/11 but lied and spent 25 years covering it up. The “scary communist” is delivering transparency. https://t.co/BlwLtYe7tc

    48K12K828163489K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026131x their median

    She “declined?” “Declined”? You can’t just decline to get a security clearance. You either get one or you don’t have a job. So much dysfunction in this White House. When will the GOP have had enough? Why risk the country for this? https://t.co/X0unu3P0FX

    30K8.0K8022611.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202673x their median

    The State Department said ​it takes "full responsibility" for "hastily" altering and then presenting a map of Africa at a global AIDS conference that mislabeled every single country it highlighted. An analysis by Reuters found a watermark in the map image that suggests it was made with OpenAI.

    15K4.8K6869741.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202642x their median

    Senate Republicans ignore the Epstein survivors and confirm Todd Blanche. House Republicans ignore Bernie and Emily Moreno and do nothing about Max Miller. Zuckerberg's yacht ignores people in distress. It's Donald Trump's party.

    9.8K2.6K14735123K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202639x their median

    If you want to know what’s wrong with Washington, take a look at the Rand Paul/Dr. Fauci hearing. Pointing fingers and assigning blame rather than learning lessons to prevent the next pandemic. Where are the hearings on the measles outbreak? How about hearings on the cyclosporiasis outbreak? If that’s not enough to get you sick, this administration continues to leave Americans more vulnerable than ever to disease as they continue to dismantle the FDA and the CDC.

    7.9K1.5K2.0K1701.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202635x their median

    Trump promised to balance the budget. Musk projected $2 trillion in savings. This year, the deficit grew by 18% — with $200 billion of that due to refunds of his illegal tariffs. My @nytopinion Chart https://t.co/aSuK1r67VU

    6.7K3.1K329289655K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202625x their median

    The Rot at the Heart of Trump's Treasury: A Regime So Corrupt Even Its Own Loyalists Are Fleeing Before the Handcuffs Arrive In Trump's second term, senior Treasury officials are quitting in droves rather than risk prison. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already suffered a "dramatic exodus." At least four of the seven top officials left after clashing with the White House over demands to stretch — or violate — tax law. Seven of 16 Senate-confirmed appointees (44 percent) have quit or been pushed out. Bessent has burned through at least three chiefs of staff. The flashpoints were explicit. Officials resisted pressure to hand over taxpayer data for the administration's immigration crackdown. They also rejected a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund designed to compensate Trump allies and kill any past or future IRS audits of the president and his family. Senate Republicans forced the fund's abandonment, but the demand itself exposed the agenda. These career professionals are not fleeing out of sudden conscience alone. They fully intend to work again once this criminal regime's reign of terror and corruption ends. They know that complying with illegal orders now could mean disbarment, indictment, or permanent exile from government and private-sector work later. Mark Mazur, a veteran tax official who served both parties, stated the obvious: "They're asking them to do stuff that is well beyond the norm, and for some things that may or may not be legal. A lot of these people expect to have a career after this administration, and being disbarred would be a bad thing for them." This turnover exceeds that under any other treasury secretary this century. Even Republican tax professionals are refusing to comply. The pattern is clear: the White House is treating tax law as optional when it protects one man. Officials who still value their freedom, licenses, and future livelihoods are walking away while they still can.

    4.8K2.4K159142199K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202623x their median

    The trade deficit in August was $36 billion larger than the Biden average. Trump's tariffs have failed. https://t.co/eJo4LPOgnI

    4.5K2.1K164147181K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202617x their median

    DOJ’s seven-figure payout to convicted abortion clinic blocker shows slush fund is very much alive. My thoughts in @opinion.bloomberg.com. Gift link: https://t.co/FSnbQXzuib

    3.1K1.8K473439K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lastword

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.825% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 285x its own typical post.

What is Lawrence O'Donnell's engagement rate on X?
Lawrence O'Donnell (@Lawrence) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,892,560 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Lawrence O'Donnell sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Lawrence have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Lawrence post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going