Back to @LarkDavis's profile

Lark Davis engagement report

@LarkDavis - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 183 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.311%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
2.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
124
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
7.97/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 183 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.311% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 183 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 183 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #ad.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lark Davis's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Lark Davis sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202640x their median

    bitcoin:native just pumped $16,000 in ONE WEEK. Four years ago, an entire Bitcoin was worth $15,500. I don’t think people comprehend how violent the upside can get.

    4.6K3295919139K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202611x their median

    61 Lost Bitcoins Retrieved! A British guy bought £1,500 of Bitcoin in 2011 through Intersango, the UK's first crypto exchange, then it collapsed in 2014 with his coins frozen inside. In 2018 the founders emailed him to claim his funds and he deleted it thinking it was a scam. Spent 12 years watching Bitcoin peak at nearly £94k a coin while his mates asked where his millions went. His wife convinced him to call CEL Solicitors this year, they worked through US court filings, and four months later all 61 coins landed in his wallet. That's about £3.3 million. Happy ending, hope he enjoys the gains.

    1.2K5650671K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202610x their median

    Bernstein just updated its BTC target. $125K by end of 2026 $300K cycle peak in 2029 $1M by 2033 That’s the base case. Bull case is $500K in 2029. They say institutions capped this drawdown at ~50% vs the old 75–90% crashes. Possible or too bullish? https://t.co/khK7mIhLua

    1.0K149931458K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.4x their median

    Crypto is not a shortcut to wealth. It is an asymmetric bet on a technology and monetary property that most people still do not understand. The returns are not from luck. They are from being early and staying patient.

    99810657949K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20268.2x their median

    Your grandfather bought land. Your father bought a house. You have the chance to buy digital assets before the rest of the world figures it out. Every generation gets one window. This one is yours.

    8427886850K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.0x their median

    Crypto is the first asset in history where a person with a phone and $50 has access to the same asset as a billion-dollar institution. That access did not exist before. Most people are not using it.

    8637551348K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20266.0x their median

    Today, we're publishing BIP SHRINCS, the first concrete proposal for a post-quantum signature scheme designed specifically for Bitcoin. The BIP draft turns what began as a rough idea into exact algorithms with an executable reference implementation. This is an important milestone: the discussion can now focus on analyzing, criticizing, and improving a concrete proposal. The BIP makes choices ranging from major design questions, such as whether to support flexible XMSS and how to balance signature size against verification time, to the many smaller decisions involved in saving a byte here or there. All of these choices are up for debate. Big thanks to Mike Casey, @conduition, @Ethan_Heilman, @kudinov_mikhail, @olkurbatov, Boris Nagaev, and @remix7531 for their contributions to the BIP. A lot more work lies ahead: - The draft BIP specifies only the cryptography. Using SHRINCS in Bitcoin Script will require a separate BIP. - We are working on a security proof for the exact construction and parameters. - Wallet integration and user experience, for example around backups and recovery after state loss, are still at an early stage. The design space remains wide open. SHRINCS is not intended to be Bitcoin's "final" signature scheme, and it is not optimal along every axis. I do think it is a very good trade-off among the options we have now. bitcoin-dev post: https://t.co/BHYMfQ5c97 Draft BIP: https://t.co/rl3X7VdbRy

    5351413728114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.4x their median

    Coinbase's Brian Armstrong just told CNBC the crypto bill is basically a done deal. Both sides got most of what they wanted, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune doesn't put bills on the floor unless he knows they'll pass. Vote's Sept 15. Cross your fingers, rub the rabbit's foot, and let's see.

    5666335549K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.1x their median

    One Bitcoin. 21 million ever made. 8 billion people on earth. The math is not complicated. The discipline to act on it is.

    5413161250K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.8x their median

    The people who got wealthy in crypto did not find the perfect entry. They stopped waiting for one. Perfect entry is a myth. Consistent entry is a strategy.

    5272447245K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 183 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.311% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 183 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is Lark Davis's engagement rate on X?
Lark Davis (@LarkDavis) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 183 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,526,997 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Lark Davis sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LarkDavis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LarkDavis post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 7.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Lark Davis (@LarkDavis) Engagement Rate - 0.008% | PlayerSells