Back to @LangmanVince's profile

Vince Langman engagement report

@LangmanVince - 569K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.044%
of 569K followers
Per impression
2.46%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
1.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
248
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 248 interactions against 569K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 2.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 125x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vince Langman's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, Vince Langman sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026125x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: The FBI has ARRESTED Democrat Massachusetts State Rep. Francisco Paulino for PANDEMIC FRAUD Paulino faces SEVERAL DECADES in prison. DOJ alleges the disgraced Rep. scammed taxpayers out $700,000 in pandemic relief funds for personal use, using it real estate expenses, loan payments, and transfers to his campaign account To make matters worse, Paulino also LOANED OUT taxpayer dollars at a SIGNIFICANTLY higher interest rate than he was paying, just to line his own pockets. He faces an 11-count indictment: eight counts of wire fraud (or aiding and abetting wire fraud) and three counts of unlawful monetary transactions/money laundering

    24K6.0K655231399K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026100x their median

    This will forever be Bernie Sanders's legacy! https://t.co/IaCmsVrpFD

    19K5.1K606200268K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202625x their median

    Now is the time to clean up the Supreme Court and boldly reform it. My plan is to set term limits for Supreme Court Justices at 18 years and institute an age limit of 75 across the federal bench. The lifetime appointment is a relic of a bygone era in our country. My plan would create a system where there are vacancies for each President to fill, instead of these Justices gaming it to benefit their political party. And, in January of 2029, the next President would immediately have two appointments to make, because Justices Alito and Thomas are over 75.

    1.0K2464.6K205264K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202620x their median

    JUST IN: Tesla Model Y is the world’s "best-selling" car of 2026 so far

    4.5K31711282242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202613x their median

    One reason why Dolly Parton was universally loved was the fact that she stayed away from politics. Someone needs to show Jelly Roll this video clip! https://t.co/7QDmzBko0Z

    2.7K423871928K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.8x their median

    🚨 JUST NOW — Jelly Roll is being called out as a MASSIVE fraud. He’s attacking President Trump now, yet was previously ecstatic walking up to him and acting like his biggest fan. Hollywood’s influence at work again. The pattern is clear. https://t.co/GTyWjYpsHa

    1.1K260681447K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.7x their median

    What an excellent commercial from Steve Hilton, he's California's last hope! https://t.co/PzL2eLrFmA

    89524914115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.9x their median

    Jelly Roll making jokes about fat people would be like Hunter Biden making jokes about deadbeat dad's! https://t.co/8Eelb0lJJ9

    82210529110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    In case you're wondering what type of person would vote for today's insane Democratic party? This type 👇 https://t.co/ESFDgBkH4A

    5811221911420K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.2x their median

    Apparently one of the side effects of Ozempic is retardation! https://t.co/FPVLNVzDJQ

    501301529.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 248 interactions against 569K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 2.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 125x its own typical post.

What is Vince Langman's engagement rate on X?
Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 569,352 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, Vince Langman sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LangmanVince have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LangmanVince post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going